Clemson
2012 Team Stats (5 games)
62.2
PPG
68.0
Opp
-5.8
Margin
40.9%
FG%
31.2%
3P%
64.7%
FT%
29.0
RPG
11.6
APG
10.4
TO
-
Est. poss./game
65.3
Adj PPG
59.2
Adj Opp PPG
#89
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1161 (#92) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1022 (#149) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 980 (#193) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +6.7 (#85) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +5.6 (#94) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.660 (#96) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.809 (#70) | AdjNet +12.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.813 (#70) | AdjNet +12.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.636 (#89) | AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 59.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.559 (#114) | AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 62.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.641 (#106) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.626 (#107) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1051 (#137) | RD 135 | GP 28 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audia Young
|
G | 27 | 34.6 | 13.0 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 16.0 | 97 | 25 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 38.3 | 28.0 | 79.3 | -1.09 | 164.4 | 45.7 |
Tanner Smith
|
G | 27 | 32.7 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 16.7 | 126 | 25 | 5.0 | 6.9 | 46.4 | 42.9 | 72.0 | 3.99 | 158.9 | 55.4 |
Devin Booker
|
F-C | 27 | 29.4 | 10.9 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 16.2 | 134 | 25 | 5.4 | 8.1 | 51.3 | 22.2 | 76.9 | 3.43 | 164.4 | 52.6 |
Milton Jennings
|
F | 24 | 26.1 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 101 | 22 | 4.6 | 7.8 | 41.1 | 22.2 | 50.0 | 1.09 | 140.3 | 43.8 |
K.J. McDaniels
|
F | 26 | 10.8 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 20 | 23 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 50.0 | 11.1 | 64.7 | 1.34 | 157.8 | 51.8 |
Catalin Baciu
|
C | 27 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 4.9 | -45 | 25 | -1.8 | -8.1 | 60.0 | 0 | 53.3 | -3.23 | 146.2 | 60.0 |
Rod Hall
|
G | 27 | 16.1 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 4.8 | 62 | 25 | 2.5 | 6.2 | 42.1 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.23 | 194.8 | 42.1 |
T.J. Sapp
|
G | 26 | 16.2 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 4.7 | 21 | 25 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 23.3 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -1.37 | 148.0 | 33.3 |
Bryan Narcisse
|
F | 27 | 15.1 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 59 | 25 | 2.4 | 7.1 | 42.9 | 28.6 | 100.0 | 1.83 | 160.4 | 47.6 |
Devin Coleman
|
G | 20 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 2.1 | -13 | 15 | -0.9 | -4.1 | 31.4 | 11.1 | 85.7 | -2.38 | 63.0 | 32.9 |
Bernard Sullivan
|
F | 24 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.9 | -36 | 21 | -1.7 | -9.1 | 25.0 | 0 | 60.0 | -4.58 | 274.2 | 25.0 |
Carson Fields
|
G | 8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | -6 | 6 | -1.0 | -29.6 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.25 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG