๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Clemson

Also known as: Clemson Tigers, Clemson
Program History

2012 Team Stats (5 games)

62.2
PPG
68.0
Opp
-5.8
Margin
40.9%
FG%
31.2%
3P%
64.7%
FT%
29.0
RPG
11.6
APG
10.4
TO
-
Est. poss./game
65.3
Adj PPG
59.2
Adj Opp PPG
#89
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2011-2012
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1161 (#92) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1022 (#149) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +101 elo More โ†’ 980 (#193) HCA +101 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +6.7 (#85) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +5.6 (#94) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.660 (#96) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +12.5 More โ†’ 0.809 (#70) AdjNet +12.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +12.7 More โ†’ 0.813 (#70) AdjNet +12.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 59.2 More โ†’ 0.636 (#89) AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 59.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 62.2 More โ†’ 0.559 (#114) AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 62.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.641 (#106) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.626 (#107) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 135 | GP 28 More โ†’ 1051 (#137) RD 135 | GP 28

2012 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2011-11-11 vs Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs W 65 - 44
2011-11-16 @ The Citadel Bulldogs W 73 - 50
2011-11-19 vs Charleston Cougars L 69 - 72
2011-11-22 vs Coastal Carolina Chanticleers L 59 - 60
2011-11-25 vs Furman Paladins W 59 - 49
2011-11-29 @ Iowa Hawkeyes W 71 - 55
2011-12-04 vs South Carolina Gamecocks L 55 - 58
2011-12-10 @ Arizona Wildcats L 47 - 63
2011-12-17 vs Winthrop Eagles W 60 - 40
2011-12-19 vs Alabama State Hornets W 70 - 45
2011-12-22 vs UTEP Miners L 48 - 61
2011-12-23 @ Southern Illinois Salukis W 83 - 75
2011-12-25 @ Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors L 68 - 75
2012-01-01 vs East Tennessee State Buccaneers W 65 - 58
2012-01-07 vs Florida State Seminoles W 79 - 59
2012-01-15 vs Duke Blue Devils L 66 - 73
2012-01-18 @ Miami Hurricanes L 73 - 76
2012-01-28 vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons W 71 - 60
2012-01-31 @ Virginia Cavaliers L 61 - 65
2012-02-04 @ Virginia Tech Hokies L 65 - 67
2012-02-07 vs Maryland Terrapins L 62 - 64
2012-02-14 vs Virginia Cavaliers W 60 - 48
2012-02-18 @ North Carolina Tar Heels L 52 - 74
2012-02-21 @ Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets W 56 - 37
2012-02-25 vs NC State Wolfpack W 72 - 69
2012-03-01 vs Virginia Tech Hokies W 58 - 56
2012-03-04 @ Florida State Seminoles L 72 - 80
2012-03-08 vs Virginia Tech Hokies L 63 - 68

2012 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Audia Young Audia Young G 27 34.6 13.0 2.7 3.3 1.7 0.0 1.3 3.5 16.0 97 25 3.9 5.0 38.3 28.0 79.3 -1.09 164.4 45.7
Tanner Smith Tanner Smith G 27 32.7 11.2 5.0 4.1 1.5 0.2 2.1 3.1 16.7 126 25 5.0 6.9 46.4 42.9 72.0 3.99 158.9 55.4
Devin Booker Devin Booker F-C 27 29.4 10.9 7.0 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.9 2.9 16.2 134 25 5.4 8.1 51.3 22.2 76.9 3.43 164.4 52.6
Milton Jennings Milton Jennings F 24 26.1 9.7 5.6 1.1 0.9 1.0 2.2 3.0 13.0 101 22 4.6 7.8 41.1 22.2 50.0 1.09 140.3 43.8
K.J. McDaniels K.J. McDaniels F 26 10.8 4.3 2.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.4 1.1 6.2 20 23 0.9 3.7 50.0 11.1 64.7 1.34 157.8 51.8
Catalin Baciu Catalin Baciu C 27 10.3 4.0 2.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.1 4.9 -45 25 -1.8 -8.1 60.0 0 53.3 -3.23 146.2 60.0
Rod Hall Rod Hall G 27 16.1 3.6 1.3 1.1 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.7 4.8 62 25 2.5 6.2 42.1 0 50.0 0.23 194.8 42.1
T.J. Sapp T.J. Sapp G 26 16.2 3.6 1.7 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.8 1.2 4.7 21 25 0.8 2.2 23.3 33.3 50.0 -1.37 148.0 33.3
Bryan Narcisse Bryan Narcisse F 27 15.1 2.7 2.2 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 5.3 59 25 2.4 7.1 42.9 28.6 100.0 1.83 160.4 47.6
Devin Coleman Devin Coleman G 20 9.9 2.4 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.6 1.8 2.1 -13 15 -0.9 -4.1 31.4 11.1 85.7 -2.38 63.0 32.9
Bernard Sullivan Bernard Sullivan F 24 7.4 1.4 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 1.9 -36 21 -1.7 -9.1 25.0 0 60.0 -4.58 274.2 25.0
Carson Fields Carson Fields G 8 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 -6 6 -1.0 -29.6 100.0 0 0 -1.25 100.0 100.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG