Clemson
2011 Team Stats (7 games)
71.9
PPG
61.5
Opp
+7.1
Margin
43.3%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
69.9%
FT%
36.3
RPG
13.7
APG
13.6
TO
80.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1857 (#10) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1452 (#73) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.9 (#42) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.582 (#39) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.686 (#55) | NetEff +6.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.766 (#30) | AdjNet +10.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.768 (#29) | AdjNet +10.4 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Stitt
|
G | 18 | 35.3 | 14.9 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 17.1 | - | - | - | 40.7 | 30.8 | 75.6 | - | 104.9 | 46.3 |
J. Grant
|
F-C | 18 | 28.1 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 4.2 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 51.3 | 0 | 69.2 | - | 113.8 | 51.3 |
Audia Young
|
G | 18 | 32.1 | 11.2 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 12.4 | - | - | - | 40.9 | 39.7 | 75.0 | - | 108.3 | 55.1 |
D. Booker
|
F-C | 18 | 25.6 | 8.8 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 3.9 | 11.6 | - | - | - | 46.5 | 46.7 | 85.0 | -0.19 | 99.6 | 51.4 |
M. Jennings
|
F | 18 | 19.4 | 8.1 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 45.9 | 26.9 | 85.7 | - | 99.6 | 51.6 |
T. Smith
|
G | 16 | 27.3 | 7.6 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 10.6 | -2 | -2.0 | -92.3 | 58.3 | 50.0 | 60.0 | -1.22 | 106.5 | 69.8 |
N. Johnson
|
F | 1 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 44.4 | 20.0 |
B. Narcisse
|
F | 18 | 14.8 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 50.0 | 44.4 | - | 129.8 | 63.9 |
C. Stanton
|
G | 18 | 8.7 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 30.0 | 71.4 | - | 99.6 | 41.7 |
C. Baciu
|
C | 11 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 37.5 | - | 99.7 | 100.0 |
Z. Anderson
|
G | 18 | 9.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 120.5 | 25.0 |
J. Baize
|
F | 7 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
D. Hopkins
|
G | 5 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG