Central Michigan Chippewas
2026 Team Stats (28 games)
70.6
PPG
65.6
Opp
+5.0
Margin
42.9%
FG%
36.2%
3P%
69.8%
FT%
42.1
RPG
13.4
APG
18.6
TO
86.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1024 (#159) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +15.3 (#131) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.584 (#141) | AdjO 68.5 | AdjD 64.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.809 (#133) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.771 (#137) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1070 (#160) | RD 135 | GP 28 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Morson
|
G | 28 | 32.6 | 19.9 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 15.4 | 8.9 | 23 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 44.9 | 40.0 | 83.2 | 5.75 | 56.1 | 50.2 |
A. Darrington
|
F | 27 | 25.8 | 15.1 | 7.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 10.1 | 11.4 | -22 | -1.1 | -1.8 | 56.4 | 0 | 67.3 | -1.2 | 60.3 | 56.4 |
N. Mitchell
|
F | 17 | 22.9 | 7.2 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 6.5 | 5.6 | -53 | -2.9 | -4.5 | 39.1 | 28.6 | 67.5 | 0.82 | 48.2 | 43.6 |
D. Prewitt
|
F | 28 | 22.8 | 7.1 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 6.2 | 6.0 | -28 | -1.3 | -2.5 | 48.0 | 0.0 | 59.6 | -3.02 | 50.5 | 48.0 |
T. Anderson
|
G | 28 | 26.6 | 6.1 | 9.9 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 5.7 | 12.6 | - | - | - | 32.1 | 34.4 | 69.4 | - | 43.8 | 35.5 |
L. Turnbull
|
G | 26 | 22.8 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 6.5 | 2.3 | -15 | -0.8 | -1.8 | 32.7 | 32.3 | 60.0 | -0.39 | 39.7 | 39.0 |
J. Mosley
|
G | 26 | 13.8 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 22 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 41.6 | 42.2 | 100.0 | 0.92 | 62.2 | 60.4 |
R. Smith
|
F | 12 | 12.0 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 163 | 7.8 | 10.0 | 39.1 | 41.2 | 75.0 | 0.3 | 55.5 | 54.3 |
Z. Chevre
|
F | 16 | 26.6 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 4.7 | 5.8 | -10 | -0.6 | -0.8 | 34.7 | 23.1 | 56.5 | 1.2 | 39.9 | 36.7 |
R. Buschell
|
G | 24 | 20.9 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 1.3 | -19 | -1.1 | -2.2 | 32.5 | 25.0 | 53.1 | -2.27 | 41.2 | 37.7 |
T. Johnson
|
C | 26 | 8.5 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 176 | 7.7 | 9.9 | 46.3 | 0 | 59.3 | 0.52 | 51.1 | 46.3 |
M. Ham
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
A. Smith
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 60 | 4.6 | 9.5 | - | - | - | 4.23 | - | - |
Kara Bartels
|
C | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG