California Golden Bears
2025 Team Stats (17 games)
67.6
PPG
66.5
Opp
+1.1
Margin
43.7%
FG%
31.7%
3P%
67.0%
FT%
37.6
RPG
13.8
APG
19.1
TO
83.0
Pace
77.5
AdjO
56.1
AdjD
#35
Rank
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1170 (#74) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1298 (#36) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +22.2 (#35) | HCA +2.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.806 (#69) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.806 (#69) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.973 (#39) | AdjNet +31.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.975 (#39) | AdjNet +31.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.875 (#35) | AdjO 77.5 | AdjD 56.1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-05 | vs | Alabama Crimson Tide | W | 69 - 65 |
| 2024-12-13 | vs | Stanford Cardinal | W | 83 - 63 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Fordham Rams | W | 69 - 53 |
| 2024-12-22 | vs | Temple Owls | W | 89 - 63 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | Clemson Tigers | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2025-01-05 | @ | SMU Mustangs | W | 81 - 66 |
| 2025-01-09 | vs | NC State Wolfpack | W | 78 - 71 |
| 2025-01-12 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | W | 82 - 70 |
| 2025-01-16 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 38 - 72 |
| 2025-01-19 | @ | Wake Forest Demon Deacons | W | 67 - 55 |
| 2025-01-23 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | W | 75 - 72 |
| 2025-01-30 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 52 - 65 |
| 2025-02-02 | vs | Pittsburgh Panthers | W | 84 - 53 |
| 2025-02-06 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | L | 63 - 70 |
| 2025-02-09 | @ | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 52 - 91 |
| 2025-03-07 | @ | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 64 - 73 |
| 2025-03-22 | vs | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 46 - 59 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Krimili
|
G | 17 | 35.0 | 14.3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 13.2 | 5.6 | 46 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 36.6 | 31.7 | 69.4 | 1.5 | 49.5 | 46.7 |
M. Suarez
|
F | 15 | 29.2 | 13.2 | 7.1 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 11.8 | 7.4 | - | - | - | 45.2 | 30.5 | 74.1 | - | 52.4 | 50.3 |
L. Twidale
|
G | 17 | 31.1 | 11.6 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 10.5 | 3.6 | 48 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 36.5 | 34.4 | 88.5 | 0.77 | 52.0 | 48.9 |
U. Onyiah
|
F | 17 | 22.7 | 10.8 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 7.4 | 11.1 | 28 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 61.6 | 0 | 56.9 | 0.51 | 62.1 | 61.6 |
K. Williams
|
G | 17 | 33.1 | 10.5 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 50 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 45.8 | 38.5 | 54.2 | 0.94 | 54.4 | 53.9 |
N. Ackerman
|
F | 11 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 3.7 | -7 | -0.3 | -2.0 | 80.0 | 0 | 66.7 | -0.43 | 79.4 | 80.0 |
Z. King
|
G | 9 | 8.3 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 2.6 | -0.6 | -17 | -0.9 | -6.0 | 30.4 | 16.7 | 57.1 | -0.56 | 36.4 | 32.6 |
G. Abigor
|
C | 17 | 8.4 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 10 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 50.0 | 0 | 42.9 | -0.05 | 49.9 | 50.0 |
G. Maul
|
G | 11 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.2 | -1 | -0.0 | -0.3 | 46.2 | 20.0 | 50.0 | -0.34 | 50.4 | 50.0 |
A. Drosouni
|
G | 15 | 9.1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | -18 | -0.8 | -5.4 | 53.8 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -0.46 | 65.8 | 57.7 |
K. Mafua
|
F | 7 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36.4 | 12.5 | 0 | -1.08 | 40.9 | 40.9 |
J. Noble
|
G | 16 | 16.3 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 31.2 | 18.2 | 72.7 | 0.34 | 48.0 | 37.5 |
L. Donez
|
G | 10 | 8.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | -4 | -0.2 | -0.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | -0.15 | 30.0 | 25.0 |
S. Bowes
|
G | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | -0.5 | 2 | 0.3 | 14.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.04 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG