๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Boston University

Also known as: Boston University Terriers
Program History

2013 Team Stats (2 games)

52.0
PPG
60.0
Opp
-8.0
Margin
30.6%
FG%
30.4%
3P%
61.5%
FT%
35.5
RPG
11.0
APG
11.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
66.9
Adj PPG
65.5
Adj Opp PPG
#144
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 973 (#185) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1030 (#152) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +102 elo More โ†’ 1048 (#101) HCA +102 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.1 More โ†’ +1.2 (#147) HCA +3.1
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +1.5 (#146) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.641 (#101) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +0.4 More โ†’ 0.511 (#159) AdjNet +0.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +0.4 More โ†’ 0.512 (#159) AdjNet +0.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 66.9 | AdjD 65.5 More โ†’ 0.532 (#144) AdjO 66.9 | AdjD 65.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 65.4 More โ†’ 0.544 (#123) AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 65.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.543 (#150) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.545 (#149) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 137 | GP 30 More โ†’ 1009 (#169) RD 137 | GP 30

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-09 @ Northeastern Huskies L 64 - 65
2012-11-12 @ Canisius Golden Griffins L 75 - 83
2012-11-17 vs George Washington Colonials L 59 - 72
2012-11-20 @ Rutgers Scarlet Knights L 79 - 81
2012-11-24 @ George Mason Patriots L 45 - 48
2012-11-28 vs Coastal Carolina Chanticleers W 74 - 44
2012-12-01 @ Saint Peter's Peacocks W 74 - 66
2012-12-06 @ Coastal Carolina Chanticleers W 69 - 63
2012-12-11 @ Harvard Crimson L 64 - 65
2012-12-16 vs Quinnipiac Bobcats W 69 - 62
2012-12-22 vs Cornell Big Red W 70 - 57
2012-12-28 vs Belmont Bruins L 48 - 64
2012-12-29 @ Howard Bison W 71 - 44
2013-01-02 @ Maine Black Bears L 58 - 63
2013-01-05 vs Hartford Hawks L 74 - 77
2013-01-08 vs Vermont Catamounts W 63 - 53
2013-01-12 vs Binghamton Bearcats W 83 - 59
2013-01-15 @ Stony Brook Seawolves L 48 - 75
2013-01-19 @ New Hampshire Wildcats W 69 - 59
2013-01-23 @ Albany Great Danes W 85 - 80
2013-01-26 vs UMBC Retrievers W 81 - 75
2013-02-02 @ Hartford Hawks L 58 - 66
2013-02-05 vs Maine Black Bears W 79 - 72
2013-02-09 @ Binghamton Bearcats W 79 - 58
2013-02-12 @ Vermont Catamounts W 64 - 59
2013-02-17 vs New Hampshire Wildcats W 68 - 56
2013-02-20 vs Albany Great Danes W 79 - 69
2013-02-23 @ UMBC Retrievers W 68 - 59
2013-02-28 vs Stony Brook Seawolves L 55 - 71
2013-03-19 @ Loyola Maryland Greyhounds L 63 - 70

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
D.J. Irving D.J. Irving G 30 34.7 14.2 3.3 3.6 1.4 0.0 2.7 2.4 17.6 83 21 4.0 5.2 29.6 31.0 68.8 1.06 273.6 35.9
Dom Morris Dom Morris F 30 28.4 11.6 6.4 0.6 0.8 0.3 1.4 1.7 16.6 133 21 6.3 10.1 47.1 100.0 83.3 4.89 296.2 48.0
Maurice Watson Maurice Watson G 30 29.5 11.2 3.3 5.4 1.7 0.0 3.0 1.7 16.9 86 21 4.1 6.1 36.0 35.7 100.0 1.92 313.0 41.0
John Papale John Papale G 30 30.3 9.3 2.6 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.7 1.5 11.6 60 21 2.9 4.2 39.1 36.4 50.0 -0.88 282.7 52.2
Malik Thomas Malik Thomas G 30 23.1 7.3 5.3 1.3 1.0 0.7 1.4 1.4 12.7 26 21 1.2 2.5 44.2 33.3 50.0 -2.79 248.4 48.8
Travis Robinson Travis Robinson F 30 23.1 6.7 2.3 0.8 1.2 0.3 0.9 1.4 8.9 -8 21 -0.4 -0.7 42.9 37.9 50.0 -3.1 215.5 56.0
Nathan Dieudonne Nathan Dieudonne F 28 17.1 4.5 3.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.6 7.3 12 20 0.6 1.5 37.5 57.1 100.0 -2.26 386.3 50.0
Zach Chionuma Zach Chionuma G 30 5.7 1.5 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.8 -44 21 -2.1 -14.4 23.1 25.0 66.7 -5.03 153.6 30.8
Justin Alston Justin Alston F 21 6.7 1.5 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.3 2.4 -15 16 -0.9 -6.9 66.7 0 0.0 -1.61 225.3 66.7
James Kennedy James Kennedy F 23 7.1 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.5 -23 16 -1.4 -9.6 66.7 0 0 -2.06 366.7 66.7
Jamaal Gill Jamaal Gill - 3 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.3 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Chris Kurz Chris Kurz F 4 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 -0.2 - - - - 0 0 0 -1.22 0 0
Dylan Brossman Dylan Brossman G 4 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 -1.04 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG