Boston College
2022 Team Stats (2 games)
61.0
PPG
68.1
Opp
-1.2
Margin
41.0%
FG%
34.3%
3P%
77.4%
FT%
37.5
RPG
10.0
APG
14.0
TO
73.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1113 (#198) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1262 (#123) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 942 (#563) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +28.3 (#105) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +19.1 (#82) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.437 (#69) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.288 (#185) | NetEff -8.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.541 (#61) | AdjNet +1.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.542 (#61) | AdjNet +1.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.570 (#160) | AdjO 69.1 | AdjD 66.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.761 (#149) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.727 (#152) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1007 (#212) | RD 130 | GP 32 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Ashton-Langford
|
- | 32 | 34.3 | 11.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 14.5 | -15 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 39.4 | 27.3 | 73.0 | 0.7 | 129.8 | 45.3 |
Langford Jr., Demarr
|
G | 28 | 35.8 | 11.0 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 14.5 | - | - | - | 40.2 | 0.0 | 63.8 | - | 116.1 | 40.2 |
J. LaRavia
|
- | 1 | 25.0 | 11.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 26.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.35 | 0 | 0 |
Jaeden Zackery
|
G | 26 | 34.5 | 10.2 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 11.9 | 33 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 44.0 | 48.7 | 69.0 | 1.06 | 127.7 | 54.4 |
J. Karnik
|
- | 26 | 23.0 | 9.7 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 13.7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 59.5 | 0.0 | 81.2 | 0.43 | 286.1 | 59.5 |
Quinten Post
|
- | 30 | 21.8 | 9.6 | 5.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 12.3 | 20 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 54.3 | 42.9 | 70.8 | 0.66 | 124.6 | 57.1 |
B. Galloway
|
- | 19 | 24.2 | 7.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 6.8 | -25 | -1.0 | -1.6 | 37.7 | 28.6 | 76.5 | 0.14 | 96.8 | 46.4 |
T.J. Bickerstaff
|
- | 24 | 24.9 | 6.3 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 13.6 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 42.9 | 75.0 | 0.49 | 165.1 | 42.3 |
N. Bohannon
|
F | 2 | 23.5 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 18 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 0 |
M. Linssen
|
F | 1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 81 | 2.6 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 0 |
P. Harding
|
G | 1 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 | -194 | -7.8 | -14.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.16 | 0 | 0 |
K. Jones
|
- | 17 | 9.2 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.4 | -97 | -3.2 | -12.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.61 | 600.0 | 0.0 |
B. Matos
|
F | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | -48 | -1.7 | -6.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.14 | 0 | 0 |
G. Thompson
|
- | 9 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | -21 | -1.2 | -5.5 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.28 | 175.0 | 25.0 |
J. Vander Baan
|
C | 6 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 3.0 | -14 | -1.3 | -9.7 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.12 | 184.4 | 50.0 |
F. Scott
|
F | 6 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -9 | -1.3 | -5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.36 | 58.3 | 0.0 |
Q. Pemberton
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Abe Atiyeh
|
- | 3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 56.8 | 0 |
A. Kenny
|
- | 10 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 14 | 1.3 | 17.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.29 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
D. McGlockton
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
D. Jones
|
G | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 176 | 5.3 | 6.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
R. McAdoo
|
G | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Lester
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Noel
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG