🐻⬇️🏀

Arizona State Sun Devils

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Arizona State Sun Devils
Program History

2017 Team Stats (24 games)

63.8
PPG
57.7
Opp
+6.1
Margin
41.1%
FG%
31.8%
3P%
69.5%
FT%
38.9
RPG
14.0
APG
14.8
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.8
Adj PPG
47.8
Adj Opp PPG
#22
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2016-2017
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1268 (#52) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1272 (#29) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +87 elo More → 1064 (#94) HCA +87 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → +22.0 (#20) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More → +23.2 (#18) HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.759 (#72) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +33.0 More → 0.979 (#19) AdjNet +33.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +33.7 More → 0.980 (#20) AdjNet +33.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 47.8 More → 0.860 (#22) AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 47.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.2 | AdjD 53.0 More → 0.769 (#21) AdjO 66.2 | AdjD 53.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.881 (#26) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.868 (#27) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 110 | GP 33 More → 1210 (#44) RD 110 | GP 33

2017 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2016-11-11 vs Illinois State Redbirds W 76 - 40
2016-11-13 vs San José State Spartans W 82 - 37
2016-11-19 @ Marquette Golden Eagles L 63 - 75
2016-11-25 vs Maryland Terrapins L 42 - 83
2016-11-26 @ St. John's Red Storm W 54 - 41
2016-12-03 vs Boston University Terriers W 71 - 42
2016-12-04 vs Florida Gators W 69 - 63
2016-12-11 @ Kentucky Wildcats W 73 - 71
2016-12-13 @ Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders W 69 - 48
2016-12-17 vs Oral Roberts Golden Eagles W 79 - 52
2016-12-21 vs Holy Cross Crusaders W 63 - 33
2016-12-30 vs Stanford Cardinal L 57 - 64
2017-01-01 vs California Golden Bears W 72 - 62
2017-01-06 @ Utah Utes W 66 - 44
2017-01-08 @ Colorado Buffaloes W 71 - 52
2017-01-13 vs Washington State Cougars W 68 - 49
2017-01-15 vs Washington Huskies L 54 - 65
2017-01-20 @ California Golden Bears W 54 - 45
2017-01-22 @ Stanford Cardinal L 56 - 66
2017-01-27 @ UCLA Bruins L 60 - 69
2017-01-29 @ USC Trojans L 50 - 65
2017-02-03 vs Oregon State Beavers L 45 - 54
2017-02-05 vs Oregon Ducks W 68 - 63
2017-02-10 @ Washington State Cougars W 61 - 58
2017-02-12 @ Washington Huskies L 57 - 70
2017-02-17 @ Arizona Wildcats L 58 - 62
2017-02-19 vs Arizona Wildcats W 67 - 54
2017-02-24 vs USC Trojans W 69 - 62
2017-02-26 vs UCLA Bruins L 52 - 55
2017-03-02 vs Utah Utes W 72 - 54
2017-03-03 @ UCLA Bruins L 68 - 77
2017-03-17 vs Michigan State Spartans W 73 - 61
2017-03-19 @ South Carolina Gamecocks L 68 - 71

2017 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Brunner S. Brunner F 25 29.2 13.8 7.9 2.1 1.0 0.2 1.7 10.9 12.4 - - - - 49.1 37.5 75.8 - 55.3 50.7
Q. Dornstauder Q. Dornstauder C 25 23.8 10.2 6.0 0.8 0.8 1.2 2.0 8.2 8.9 - - - - 47.3 0 54.4 - 50.2 47.3
R. Richardson R. Richardson G 25 29.1 8.6 2.6 4.0 1.0 0.2 2.1 8.1 6.1 - - - - 35.1 29.3 86.4 - 47.2 40.6
R. Ryan R. Ryan G 25 24.1 7.2 3.0 1.8 0.9 0.2 1.2 6.7 5.3 - - - - 40.5 29.5 64.0 - 47.6 44.3
S. Haines S. Haines G 25 27.4 7.1 2.8 2.3 0.8 0.0 1.5 6.1 5.5 - - - - 37.5 39.3 88.9 - 51.8 45.4
A. Hawkins A. Hawkins G 3 8.7 6.0 1.7 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.7 4.3 3.7 - - - - 61.5 50.0 0.0 - 67.0 69.2
K. Ibis K. Ibis F 25 18.0 5.5 4.1 0.7 0.7 0.4 1.3 6.0 4.2 - - - - 39.6 40.0 63.6 - 43.5 41.6
K. Moos K. Moos F 13 25.7 4.3 6.2 1.2 2.2 0.4 1.3 3.7 9.2 - - - - 33.3 28.6 90.0 - 49.3 39.6
J. Ruden J. Ruden F 9 9.8 4.2 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.9 3.6 1.9 - - - - 43.8 27.3 100.0 - 54.2 48.4
K. Russell K. Russell G 19 20.5 4.1 1.5 1.6 0.7 0.1 1.6 4.5 1.7 - - - - 32.6 21.1 58.6 - 39.0 34.9
S. Goodson S. Goodson G 22 8.9 2.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.4 2.6 0.7 - - - - 36.8 33.3 0 - 47.4 47.4
S. Hattis S. Hattis C 19 5.7 1.4 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.5 0.9 - - - - 37.9 0 50.0 - 40.0 37.9
C. Johnson-Chapman C. Johnson-Chapman C 22 6.6 1.0 1.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.6 - - - - 50.0 0 0.0 - 45.5 50.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG