🐻⬇️🏀

Akron

Also known as: Akron Zips
Program History

2026 Team Stats (33 games)

87.4
PPG
73.6
Opp
+13.8
Margin
49.9%
FG%
36.8%
3P%
75.3%
FT%
37.6
RPG
18.2
APG
10.9
TO
82.4
Pace
84.5
AdjO
75.3
AdjD
#78
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1233 (#32) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1259 (#30) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +109 elo More → 1144 (#20) HCA +109 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More → +9.1 (#77) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.5 More → +20.2 (#84) HCA +2.5
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.836 (#19) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +27.1 More → 0.954 (#23) NetEff +27.1
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +11.6 More → 0.792 (#82) AdjNet +11.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +11.6 More → 0.793 (#82) AdjNet +11.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 84.5 | AdjD 75.3 More → 0.698 (#78) AdjO 84.5 | AdjD 75.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 80.2 | AdjD 70.5 More → 0.708 (#38) AdjO 80.2 | AdjD 70.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.903 (#49) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.881 (#46) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 115 | GP 33 More → 1315 (#27) RD 115 | GP 33

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs James Madison Dukes W 85 - 71
2025-11-08 vs Princeton Tigers W 104 - 69
2025-11-12 vs Penn State-Shenango Nittany Lions W 109 - 51
2025-11-16 @ Purdue Boilermakers L 79 - 97
2025-11-21 vs Iona Gaels W 96 - 75
2025-11-23 @ Evansville Purple Aces W 97 - 59
2025-11-24 vs Yale Bulldogs L 94 - 97
2025-11-29 vs Milwaukee Panthers W 105 - 81
2025-12-03 vs Bucknell Bison W 97 - 77
2025-12-13 vs Murray State Racers L 100 - 115
2025-12-19 vs Eastern Michigan Eagles W 93 - 72
2025-12-29 vs Concord Mountain Lions W 115 - 64
2026-01-03 @ Miami (OH) RedHawks L 73 - 76
2026-01-06 vs Central Michigan Chippewas W 82 - 69
2026-01-09 @ Bowling Green Falcons W 77 - 67
2026-01-13 vs Ball State Cardinals W 87 - 77
2026-01-20 @ Buffalo Bulls W 82 - 63
2026-01-23 @ Ohio Bobcats W 86 - 65
2026-01-27 vs Toledo Rockets W 91 - 81
2026-01-30 vs Kent State Golden Flashes W 69 - 52
2026-02-03 @ Eastern Michigan Eagles W 66 - 64
2026-02-07 @ Troy Trojans L 69 - 79
2026-02-14 vs Massachusetts Minutemen W 99 - 92
2026-02-17 @ Western Michigan Broncos W 90 - 73
2026-02-21 @ Ball State Cardinals W 78 - 65
2026-02-24 vs Buffalo Bulls W 99 - 85
2026-02-28 @ Kent State Golden Flashes W 92 - 70
2026-03-03 @ Central Michigan Chippewas W 77 - 64
2026-03-06 vs Northern Illinois Huskies W 94 - 55
2026-03-12 vs Buffalo Bulls W 73 - 70
2026-03-13 vs Kent State Golden Flashes W 75 - 68
2026-03-14 vs Toledo Rockets W 79 - 76
2026-03-20 @ Texas Tech Red Raiders L 71 - 91

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Johnson T. Johnson G 33 31.7 19.3 2.9 4.9 1.2 0.3 2.5 14.2 12.1 67 5.2 10.1 50.0 36.0 86.6 0.73 61.3 57.2
A. Lyles A. Lyles F 33 26.7 14.9 7.9 2.2 1.0 0.7 2.2 9.7 14.8 187 8.9 22.0 55.8 35.3 71.5 0.94 65.2 62.3
S. Scott S. Scott G 33 26.5 12.4 2.4 2.9 0.3 0.1 1.2 10.0 7.0 129 5.6 13.5 44.2 40.9 77.2 0.14 57.7 55.5
E. Mahaffey E. Mahaffey - 33 28.2 10.4 5.6 3.4 1.7 0.8 1.2 7.6 13.0 236 10.7 17.8 58.6 31.0 56.9 1.05 61.5 61.2
E. Mahaffey E. Mahaffey - 32 21.5 7.8 5.6 1.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 5.4 9.9 236 10.7 17.8 52.9 38.3 75.4 1.05 62.9 59.6
B. Hardman B. Hardman G 33 18.2 7.5 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 6.0 3.1 63 3.0 7.7 40.6 40.4 84.2 0.16 60.4 58.9
S. Young S. Young G 33 19.3 7.3 2.6 1.6 1.2 0.0 0.8 5.8 6.2 82 4.1 10.1 40.6 33.3 83.3 0.05 56.1 51.3
H. Barre H. Barre - 17 6.4 2.9 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 3.8 30 3.0 17.0 73.7 0 77.8 0.03 79.3 73.7
Z. Halligan Z. Halligan - 32 11.8 2.6 2.3 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.2 2.0 3.9 75 4.2 15.4 44.4 25.0 80.0 0.29 56.8 50.8
Ognjen Stankovic Ognjen Stankovic - 17 6.5 2.3 1.7 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.7 1.5 2.7 15 1.1 7.5 53.8 25.0 58.8 -0.23 58.2 55.8
M. Musiime-Kamali M. Musiime-Kamali - 33 8.8 2.0 1.9 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 1.1 3.7 27 1.2 5.9 72.2 0 65.2 -0.43 72.6 72.2
R. Brisco R. Brisco - 10 2.5 1.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.8 15 1.9 63.7 50.0 0 0 0.02 50.0 50.0
C. Groce C. Groce - 13 2.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 15 1.7 66.5 30.8 28.6 50.0 -0.09 39.6 38.5
C. Head C. Head G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tai Perkins Tai Perkins G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - 88 4.2 7.5 - - - 0.33 - -
Josh Henderson Josh Henderson G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - 64 3.6 4.8 - - - 0.03 - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG