Model Predictions
| Model | Purdue Boilermakers | Michigan Wolverines | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 60.1% (#3) | 39.9% (#18) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 75.3% (#1) | 24.7% (#42) | - |
| Margin | 63.0% (#5) | 37.0% (#23) | Purdue ... -2.9 |
| Pythagorean | 51.3% (#12) | 48.7% (#32) | - |
| Efficiency | 89.8% (#33) | 10.2% (#149) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 60.6% (#9) | 39.4% (#20) | - |
| Log Adjusted | 60.5% (#9) | 39.5% (#21) | - |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Purdue Boilermakers | Michigan Wolverines |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 28 | 16 |
| PPG | 77.8 | 70.1 |
| FG% | 48.4% | 45.9% |
| 3PT% | 37.4% | 32.9% |
| FT% | 71.6% | 72.5% |
| RPG | 38.5 | 33.8 |
| APG | 15.2 | 13.4 |
| SPG | 4.7 | 5.3 |
| BPG | 3.1 | 3.6 |
| TOPG | 12.0 | 12.1 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Purdue Boilermakers | Michigan Wolverines |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | 108.3 | 106.4 |
| Adj. Def Eff | 91.7 | 93.6 |
| Adj. Net Eff | 16.5 | 12.8 |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Purdue Boilermakers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Ivey | 16.9 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 31.4 |
| S. Stefanovic | 10.0 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 30.8 |
| E. Hunter Jr. | 6.7 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 26.5 |
| M. Gillis | 6.4 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 23.5 |
| T. Williams | 11.6 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 20.0 |
Michigan Wolverines Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Brooks | 12.7 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 36.2 |
| H. Dickinson | 18.8 | 8.5 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 32.6 |
| C. Houstan | 10.0 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 32.1 |
| D. Jones | 10.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 28.7 |
| M. Diabate | 9.1 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 25.2 |