Model Predictions
| Model | Indiana Hoosiers | Michigan Wolverines | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 21.8% (#46) | 78.2% (#17) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 42.7% (#26) | 57.3% (#24) | - |
| Margin | 24.1% (#39) | 75.9% (#20) | Michiga... -6.3 |
| Pythagorean | 26.5% (#63) | 73.5% (#9) | - |
| Efficiency | 1.0% (#54) | 99.0% (#6) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 7.0% (#52) | 93.0% (#8) | - |
| Log Adjusted | 7.0% (#52) | 93.0% (#8) | - |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Indiana Hoosiers | Michigan Wolverines |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 10 | 24 |
| PPG | 65.5 | 75.3 |
| FG% | 41.6% | 47.6% |
| 3PT% | 31.8% | 38.2% |
| FT% | 64.6% | 76.4% |
| RPG | 32.8 | 37.2 |
| APG | 13.4 | 15.8 |
| SPG | 5.4 | 4.4 |
| BPG | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| TOPG | 10.9 | 11.2 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Indiana Hoosiers | Michigan Wolverines |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | 101.4 | 108.7 |
| Adj. Def Eff | 98.6 | 91.3 |
| Adj. Net Eff | 2.7 | 17.4 |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Indiana Hoosiers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Jackson-Davis | 16.9 | 8.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 35.1 |
| Al Durham | 12.4 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 32.9 |
| A. Franklin | 9.4 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 30.1 |
| R. Phinisee | 7.5 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 28.1 |
| R. Thompson | 9.2 | 6.1 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 27.6 |
Michigan Wolverines Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Wagner | 12.8 | 6.5 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 32.5 |
| M. Smith | 9.4 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 32.0 |
| I. Livers | 13.1 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 31.9 |
| E. Brooks | 9.5 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 31.2 |
| H. Dickinson | 13.7 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 26.1 |