🐻⬇️🏀

Wright State Raiders

Also known as: Wright State Raiders
Program History

2025 Team Stats (1 games)

73.0
PPG
58.0
Opp
+15.0
Margin
42.6%
FG%
43.5%
3P%
84.6%
FT%
44.0
RPG
14.0
APG
17.0
TO
83.7
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 936 (#490) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +2.9 (#290) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.8 | AdjD 66.4 More → 0.397 (#460) AdjO 61.8 | AdjD 66.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.495 (#296) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.467 (#296) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 157 | GP 29 More → 864 (#476) RD 157 | GP 29

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-03-04 vs Youngstown State Penguins W 73 - 58

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Staton A. Staton F 1 28.0 17.0 27.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 14.0 33.0 0 0.0 0.0 57.1 0 50.0 0.87 57.1 57.1
C. Henson C. Henson G 1 26.0 12.0 6.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.0 10.0 -77 -2.4 -3.1 36.4 20.0 100.0 -0.61 48.7 40.9
L. Scott L. Scott G 1 24.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 11.0 0.0 7 0.2 0.3 36.4 33.3 0 0.27 45.5 45.5
M. Miller M. Miller G 1 28.0 9.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 8.0 6.0 8 0.9 4.3 37.5 40.0 50.0 -0.21 50.7 50.0
M. Taylor M. Taylor G 1 16.0 8.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 -6 -0.2 -0.7 66.7 100.0 100.0 0.06 103.1 100.0
R. Sagester R. Sagester G 1 18.0 8.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 7.0 -35 -1.1 -2.6 50.0 66.7 100.0 -0.09 82.0 75.0
E. Magestro-Kennedy E. Magestro-Kennedy G 1 7.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 -1 -0.0 -0.1 50.0 100.0 0 0.25 75.0 75.0
C. Chard Peloquin C. Chard Peloquin F 1 11.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 -43 -1.5 -4.0 50.0 0 0 -0.25 50.0 50.0
O. Brown O. Brown G 1 28.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.45 34.7 0.0
A. Riddle A. Riddle G 1 14.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 -2.0 -28 -1.2 -2.3 50.0 0 0 -0.04 50.0 50.0
F. Cotterill F. Cotterill F 1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -1.0 -23 -1.1 -8.5 0.0 0 0 -0.62 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG