🐻⬇️🏀

Wilmington (OH) Quakers

Season: 2013 2010
Also known as: Wilmington (OH) Quakers
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

67.0
PPG
84.0
Opp
-17.0
Margin
39.3%
FG%
29.6%
3P%
75.0%
FT%
35.0
RPG
16.0
APG
15.0
TO
79.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 957 (#636) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 986 (#440) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 992 (#394) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +6.1 (#466) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -7.5 (#431) HCA +3.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 67.0 More → 0.467 (#375) AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 67.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.374 (#373) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.389 (#368) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 914 (#368) RD 350 | GP 1

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-12-30 @ Miami (OH) Redhawks L 67 - 84

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
B. Candella B. Candella G 1 31.0 16.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 12.0 11.0 - - - 41.7 57.1 66.7 -0.43 60.1 58.3
D. Johnson D. Johnson G 1 25.0 8.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 8.0 8.0 147 4.7 13.7 12.5 20.0 83.3 0.77 37.6 18.8
K. Ransome K. Ransome G 1 23.0 8.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 - - - 50.0 50.0 100.0 - 82.0 75.0
M. Bankston M. Bankston G 1 21.0 6.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 - - - 50.0 0 66.7 - 56.4 50.0
M. Heard M. Heard F 1 11.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 - - - 50.0 0 100.0 - 69.4 50.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG