🐻⬇️🏀

William Carey

Also known as: William Carey Crusaders
Program History

2024 Team Stats (1 games)

42.0
PPG
64.0
Opp
-22.0
Margin
23.0%
FG%
10.7%
3P%
78.6%
FT%
40.0
RPG
6.0
APG
12.0
TO
79.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2021-2022 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +115 elo More → 994 (#388) HCA +115 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → -3.5 (#542) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.4 More → -13.5 (#505) HCA +2.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.2 | AdjD 70.3 More → 0.453 (#457) AdjO 68.2 | AdjD 70.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.253 (#506) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.289 (#504) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 2 More → 887 (#500) RD 350 | GP 2

2024 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2023-11-06 @ Southern Miss Golden Eagles L 42 - 64

2024 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
E. Smith E. Smith - 1 34.0 8.0 5.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 14.0 1.0 - - - 21.4 10.0 50.0 - 26.9 25.0
A. Gross A. Gross - 1 22.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 4.0 - - - 37.5 0.0 0 - 37.5 37.5
A. Campbell A. Campbell - 1 23.0 6.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 0.0 - - - 10.0 0.0 100.0 - 25.5 10.0
K. Moore K. Moore - 1 19.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 - - - 20.0 33.3 0 - 30.0 30.0
Z. Haralson Z. Haralson - 1 20.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 - - - 33.3 100.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
J. Rawls J. Rawls - 1 8.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 -30 -4.3 -9.0 0.0 0 100.0 -0.47 53.2 0.0
L. Shows L. Shows - 1 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
K. Laws K. Laws - 1 17.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 -4.0 - - - 16.7 0.0 0 - 16.7 16.7
D. Herrick D. Herrick - 1 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 50.0 - 12.9 0.0
C. Lewis C. Lewis - 1 15.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
J. Williams J. Williams - 1 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 -93 -11.6 -20.3 0.0 0 0 -0.64 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG