Westminster (UT)
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 795 (#511) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 797 (#502) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 857 (#644) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -3.7 (#213) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -2.9 (#412) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.053 (#563) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.085 (#401) | NetEff -18.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.165 (#542) | AdjNet -14.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.171 (#540) | AdjNet -13.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.321 (#532) | AdjO 59.2 | AdjD 67.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.381 (#545) | AdjO 62.9 | AdjD 68.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.273 (#544) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.285 (#542) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 780 (#483) | RD 102 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-04 | @ | Idaho St. | L | 47 - 99 |
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Weber St. | L | 47 - 84 |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Biola | L | 53 - 70 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | CUI | L | 74 - 89 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Alas. Fairbanks | W | 99 - 74 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Tex. A&M-Kingsville | W | 54 - 46 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Utah Tech | L | 70 - 81 |
| 2025-12-04 | @ | CSU Pueblo | L | 60 - 62 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | UCCS | L | 45 - 82 |
| 2025-12-11 | vs | Colo. Sch. of Mines | L | 62 - 78 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | MSU Denver | L | 66 - 76 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Northwest Nazarene | L | 57 - 74 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Seattle Pacific | W | 70 - 60 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Fort Lewis | L | 53 - 72 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | Colorado Mesa | L | 43 - 74 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Western Colo. | L | 60 - 62 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | Chadron St. | W | 83 - 52 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | South Dakota Mines | W | 77 - 61 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | Colo. Christian | L | 71 - 81 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | CSU Pueblo | L | 79 - 83 |
| 2026-02-05 | @ | Regis (CO) | L | 52 - 80 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Colo. Sch. of Mines | W | 73 - 69 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Mitchell | - | 20 | 34.2 | 12.5 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 13.4 | 4.3 | -68 | -3.8 | -13.1 | 34.9 | 29.2 | 80.6 | 1.29 | 43.9 | 41.1 |
| Teuila Nawahine | - | 22 | 31.8 | 11.9 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 11.3 | 8.8 | -109 | -5.2 | -16.5 | 39.8 | 24.1 | 66.7 | 0.54 | 46.5 | 42.6 |
| Madison Anderson | - | 22 | 25.4 | 11.4 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 8.9 | 10.3 | -103 | -5.2 | -17.1 | 49.2 | 35.7 | 62.1 | 0.15 | 53.8 | 50.5 |
| Emily Evans | - | 22 | 26.7 | 7.9 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 8.3 | 5.8 | -115 | -5.8 | -22.2 | 36.3 | 19.2 | 68.1 | -0.82 | 42.9 | 39.0 |
| Nisa Ellis | - | 20 | 17.9 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 5.5 | 4.7 | -17 | -0.8 | -5.2 | 42.3 | 0.0 | 64.6 | -3.13 | 47.3 | 42.3 |
| Klowie Pike | - | 22 | 24.8 | 5.8 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.8 | 3.8 | -126 | -6.3 | -26.3 | 32.7 | 20.0 | 67.9 | 1.21 | 39.4 | 36.3 |
| Makeili Ika | - | 17 | 22.4 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 4.4 | -109 | -7.3 | -37.4 | 44.9 | 27.6 | 77.8 | -1.84 | 52.8 | 50.7 |
| Alisi peaua | - | 18 | 6.4 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 2.3 | -49 | -3.3 | -46.2 | 52.4 | 0 | 80.0 | -0.42 | 56.0 | 52.4 |
| Marli Reed | - | 20 | 10.8 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 | -0.1 | -6 | -0.3 | -2.5 | 24.0 | 24.2 | 60.0 | 0.14 | 34.9 | 32.0 |
| Brianna Mendez | - | 12 | 10.0 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | -21 | -2.1 | -11.9 | 28.6 | 17.6 | 33.3 | -0.04 | 36.0 | 35.7 |
| Achol Daw | - | 17 | 7.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | -54 | -3.4 | -41.6 | 26.3 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -2.8 | 31.3 | 28.9 |
| Adriana Copeland | - | 8 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | -0.2 | -20 | -4.0 | -578.3 | 16.7 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.29 | 29.1 | 16.7 |
| Kyleigh Nielson | - | 10 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | -4 | -0.5 | -12.9 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.01 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG