🐻⬇️🏀

West Tex. A&M

Also known as: West Tex. A&M
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1291 (#16) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1370 (#7) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1219 (#10) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → +24.3 (#30) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +24.9 (#51) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.751 (#270) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +27.1 More → 0.968 (#96) NetEff +27.1
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +21.5 More → 0.923 (#189) AdjNet +21.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +22.1 More → 0.931 (#187) AdjNet +22.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 74.1 | AdjD 59.5 More → 0.790 (#176) AdjO 74.1 | AdjD 59.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 77.0 | AdjD 58.6 More → 0.842 (#13) AdjO 77.0 | AdjD 58.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.931 (#19) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.925 (#15) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 110 | GP 23 More → 1366 (#7) RD 110 | GP 23

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-01 @ Grand Valley St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-02 vs Northwest Mo. St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-14 vs Colorado Mesa - Incomplete score
2025-11-16 vs MSU Denver - Incomplete score
2025-11-20 @ UCCS - Incomplete score
2025-11-28 vs Adams St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-29 vs N.M. Highlands - Incomplete score
2025-12-04 vs Okla. Christian - Incomplete score
2025-12-06 vs Cameron - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 @ Texas-Dallas - Incomplete score
2025-12-19 @ Hawaii Pacific - Incomplete score
2026-01-02 @ Western N.M. - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 vs St. Mary's (TX) - Incomplete score
2026-01-15 @ Lubbock Christian - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 @ Midwestern St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-22 @ Eastern N.M. - Incomplete score
2026-01-29 vs UT Tyler - Incomplete score
2026-01-31 vs Texas Woman's - Incomplete score
2026-02-05 @ Cameron - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 @ Okla. Christian - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kyla Kane - 17 27.4 13.4 3.8 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.2 10.2 8.6 106 5.6 15.8 41.6 36.5 89.7 -0.56 57.2 50.6
Taylor Haggan - 20 19.4 11.2 6.7 0.8 0.8 0.2 1.6 8.2 10.0 130 5.7 25.2 58.5 11.1 55.2 -0.03 59.4 58.8
Henley West - 20 14.2 10.5 4.3 0.4 0.5 1.1 1.0 7.0 8.8 208 9.0 66.0 63.6 61.5 64.9 4.25 67.2 66.4
Randi Harding - 20 26.8 10.0 1.8 2.2 0.5 0.0 1.0 9.4 4.0 199 8.7 28.0 34.9 29.3 92.0 2.61 47.4 40.7
Claire Graham - 20 26.1 7.0 2.5 1.9 0.5 0.0 1.1 6.8 3.9 173 7.9 26.5 34.6 29.7 82.6 0.46 47.9 44.5
Karley Motschenbacher - 20 26.9 6.8 7.1 2.1 2.1 0.1 1.6 5.3 11.5 237 10.3 35.3 39.6 22.6 73.0 4.37 51.2 42.9
Kenadee Winfrey - 15 18.0 5.8 4.0 1.5 1.3 0.3 1.7 5.4 5.7 172 10.1 75.0 34.6 34.5 92.3 4.8 50.2 46.3
Taytum Bell - 19 17.2 5.7 4.3 1.4 0.9 0.1 1.3 3.3 7.7 198 9.4 51.9 61.9 100.0 60.4 3.19 64.8 63.5
Chloe Callahan - 14 7.4 4.4 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.2 3.5 2.4 52 3.1 55.2 40.8 38.7 75.0 1.86 56.2 53.1
Abbi Holder - 20 12.3 2.7 1.2 1.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 2.5 2.2 122 4.9 49.9 37.3 33.3 45.5 -0.64 44.5 43.1
Zoey McBroom - 12 7.6 2.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 2.2 0.9 -12 -0.9 -16.6 30.8 30.4 100.0 -4.21 50.6 44.2
Hollie Stalder - 15 6.5 2.0 1.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.7 1.5 1.7 60 3.5 87.6 40.9 22.2 71.4 0.29 53.3 45.5
Brooklyn Scurry - 12 4.8 1.6 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 2.6 15 1.1 35.7 61.5 0 50.0 -0.2 60.7 61.5
Anna Ferrel - 6 2.3 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.8 -10 -1.2 -52.6 60.0 50.0 0 -0.69 80.0 80.0
Tierra Owens - 6 1.8 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 -6 -0.8 -58.5 66.7 100.0 0.0 - 77.3 100.0
Presley Kane - 12 6.3 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.1 1.2 37 2.6 69.9 30.8 12.5 100.0 -0.06 39.6 34.6

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG