West Liberty
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1253 (#28) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1303 (#16) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1186 (#17) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +19.4 (#13) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +22.6 (#44) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.882 (#7) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.992 (#78) | NetEff +46.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.930 (#18) | AdjNet +22.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.929 (#19) | AdjNet +22.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.853 (#7) | AdjO 99.9 | AdjD 80.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.826 (#10) | AdjO 91.3 | AdjD 74.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.855 (#32) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.853 (#29) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1286 (#14) | RD 151 | GP 6 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Point Park | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Wheeling | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | West Virginia St. | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Charleston (WV) | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Davis & Elkins | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | West Va. Wesleyan | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-02-11 | @ | Frostburg St. | W | 112 - 108 |
| 2026-02-14 | vs | Fairmont St. | W | 96 - 91 |
| 2026-02-18 | @ | Glenville St. | W | 95 - 80 |
| 2026-02-22 | vs | Concord | W | 109 - 82 |
| 2026-02-25 | @ | Salem (WV) | W | 121 - 87 |
| 2026-02-28 | @ | Wheeling | L | 91 - 93 |
| 2026-03-06 | vs | Davis & Elkins | W | 84 - 74 |
| 2026-03-07 | vs | Glenville St. | W | 105 - 100 |
| 2026-03-08 | vs | Fairmont St. | W | 93 - 88 |
| 2026-03-14 | vs | Virginia Union | L | 46 - 52 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Kent | - | 6 | 22.0 | 15.2 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 9.5 | 12.7 | - | - | - | - | 50.9 | 33.3 | 67.6 | - | 63.2 | 59.6 |
| Cameron Williams | - | 6 | 22.0 | 15.2 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 9.5 | 12.7 | - | - | - | - | 50.9 | 33.3 | 67.6 | - | 63.2 | 59.6 |
| Myles Montgomery | - | 6 | 28.9 | 14.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 9.0 | 16.8 | - | - | - | - | 57.4 | 55.0 | 78.9 | - | 70.6 | 67.6 |
| Jamie Muldowney | - | 6 | 18.0 | 12.3 | 6.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 8.3 | 13.0 | - | - | - | - | 44.0 | 38.5 | 74.1 | - | 59.8 | 54.0 |
| Dante Spadafora | - | 6 | 18.6 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 6.0 | 9.5 | - | - | - | - | 44.4 | 41.2 | 88.9 | - | 65.8 | 54.2 |
| Landon Butler | - | 6 | 24.9 | 8.2 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 7.8 | 5.8 | - | - | - | - | 42.6 | 6.7 | 72.7 | - | 47.3 | 43.6 |
| Max Hurray | - | 6 | 14.4 | 7.7 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 6.2 | 5.2 | - | - | - | - | 45.9 | 42.9 | 100.0 | - | 60.0 | 58.1 |
| Terrance Pankey Jr | - | 6 | 16.5 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 5.8 | - | - | - | - | 55.2 | 41.7 | 60.0 | - | 64.4 | 63.8 |
| Hayden Abdullah | - | 6 | 13.8 | 7.0 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 6.3 | - | - | - | - | 67.9 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 72.7 | 73.2 |
| Aiden Davis | - | 6 | 20.7 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 6.3 | 4.3 | - | - | - | - | 36.8 | 32.0 | 100.0 | - | 51.0 | 47.4 |
| Peter Lattos | - | 5 | 11.3 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 8.2 | - | - | - | - | 61.1 | 0.0 | 87.5 | - | 67.4 | 61.1 |
| Xavier Harris | - | 5 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.6 | - | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 63.5 | 57.1 |
| Charlie Hill | - | 5 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | 28.6 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 42.9 | 42.9 |
| Daniel Burton | - | 5 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Max Butler | - | 2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG