West Florida
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1068 (#109) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1145 (#65) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1040 (#170) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -0.3 (#176) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +6.1 (#264) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.694 (#291) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.531 (#271) | NetEff +1.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.871 (#232) | AdjNet +16.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.880 (#226) | AdjNet +16.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.738 (#219) | AdjO 71.6 | AdjD 60.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.552 (#247) | AdjO 69.4 | AdjD 67.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.641 (#238) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.630 (#242) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1034 (#222) | RD 99 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Palm Beach Atl. | W | 60 - 50 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Eckerd | W | 72 - 60 |
| 2025-11-18 | vs | Tuskegee | W | 75 - 69 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Central Mo. | L | 62 - 85 |
| 2025-11-24 | @ | P.R.-Rio Piedras | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | P.R.-Mayaguez | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2025-11-30 | @ | Columbus St. | L | 78 - 85 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | UAH | L | 53 - 70 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | West Ala. | W | 67 - 61 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Valdosta St. | W | 82 - 71 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Trevecca Nazarene | W | 69 - 62 |
| 2026-01-02 | vs | Delta St. | W | 64 - 63 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Union (TN) | L | 67 - 113 |
| 2026-01-15 | vs | AUM | W | 72 - 65 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Montevallo | W | 93 - 68 |
| 2026-01-22 | @ | West Ala. | L | 62 - 66 |
| 2026-01-23 | @ | UAH | L | 67 - 79 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Valdosta St. | L | 76 - 79 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Trevecca Nazarene | L | 62 - 76 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Lee | W | 64 - 60 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel Grimes | - | 18 | 31.6 | 14.4 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 45 | 2.1 | 8.3 | 49.4 | 38.1 | 76.1 | 2.83 | 60.1 | 54.0 |
| Amelia Bell | - | 18 | 27.0 | 13.5 | 9.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 8.4 | 15.9 | 61 | 2.9 | 12.3 | 60.5 | 0 | 72.8 | 2.53 | 64.8 | 60.5 |
| Avery O'Connor | - | 18 | 18.2 | 9.6 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 8.7 | 6.0 | 40 | 1.9 | 14.2 | 37.8 | 34.3 | 77.5 | 0.08 | 49.8 | 45.5 |
| Janai Jordan | - | 18 | 23.1 | 8.3 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 8.7 | 2.5 | 57 | 2.7 | 11.1 | 32.1 | 24.6 | 82.1 | -0.23 | 43.0 | 37.5 |
| Annarose Tyre | - | 18 | 21.4 | 5.8 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 2.3 | 20 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 27.0 | 18.9 | 82.9 | 0.55 | 40.3 | 31.5 |
| Finley Kennedy | - | 18 | 21.4 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 2.8 | 42 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 35.6 | 14.8 | 64.3 | -1.54 | 41.5 | 37.6 |
| Jakeria Hawkins | - | 16 | 21.5 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 69 | 3.8 | 18.0 | 34.8 | 16.7 | 68.4 | 1.88 | 42.4 | 37.9 |
| Maddy Rendall | - | 16 | 11.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 6 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 35.4 | 25.0 | 50.0 | -0.61 | 41.9 | 41.7 |
| Chloe Galombeck | - | 12 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 31 | 2.4 | 42.6 | 50.0 | 61.5 | 50.0 | 1.47 | 67.7 | 68.2 |
| Madilyn Rendall | - | 2 | 11.6 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | -6 | -3.0 | -8.7 | 28.6 | 20.0 | 0 | -1.05 | 35.7 | 35.7 |
| Ebba Zalamans | - | 17 | 12.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 12 | 0.6 | 5.2 | 43.8 | 0.0 | 52.6 | 1.04 | 47.1 | 43.8 |
| Carmen Jones | - | 18 | 13.7 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 36 | 1.7 | 13.0 | 30.4 | 30.0 | 0 | 1.12 | 40.2 | 40.2 |
| Kathryn Ford | - | 9 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | -0.1 | -3 | -0.3 | -5.9 | 28.6 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.84 | 26.9 | 28.6 |
| Kamryn Barnitz | - | 7 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | -0.3 | -6 | -0.6 | -19.0 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -1.27 | 21.8 | 16.7 |
| Ella Schepp | - | 1 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG