🐻⬇️🏀

Washington Huskies

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Washington Huskies
Program History

2026 Team Stats (32 games)

70.8
PPG
62.6
Opp
+8.2
Margin
44.2%
FG%
34.0%
3P%
73.8%
FT%
38.7
RPG
14.1
APG
14.9
TO
81.3
Pace
74.9
AdjO
50.6
AdjD
#29
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1176 (#73) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1319 (#22) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 1088 (#80) HCA +113 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → +25.1 (#28) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +37.6 (#21) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.840 (#53) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +18.8 More → 0.912 (#37) NetEff +18.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +36.9 More → 0.987 (#26) AdjNet +36.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +38.0 More → 0.988 (#26) AdjNet +38.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 74.9 | AdjD 50.6 More → 0.901 (#29) AdjO 74.9 | AdjD 50.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 71.0 | AdjD 55.6 More → 0.801 (#27) AdjO 71.0 | AdjD 55.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.965 (#23) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.953 (#22) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 112 | GP 32 More → 1269 (#36) RD 112 | GP 32

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-10 vs Montana Lady Griz W 87 - 56
2025-11-15 @ Utah Utes W 72 - 61
2025-11-19 vs Fresno State Bulldogs W 61 - 43
2025-11-23 vs Vermont Catamounts W 71 - 39
2025-11-25 vs Southern Jaguars W 66 - 40
2025-11-28 vs UC San Diego Tritons W 67 - 50
2025-12-01 vs San José State Spartans W 80 - 54
2025-12-07 @ USC Trojans L 50 - 59
2025-12-13 vs Green Bay Phoenix W 79 - 74
2025-12-19 @ Stanford Cardinal L 62 - 67
2025-12-21 @ Pacific Tigers W 90 - 50
2025-12-29 vs Northwestern Wildcats W 94 - 73
2026-01-01 vs Michigan Wolverines W 64 - 52
2026-01-08 vs Michigan State Spartans L 67 - 82
2026-01-11 @ Purdue Boilermakers L 72 - 78
2026-01-14 @ Indiana Hoosiers W 82 - 63
2026-01-18 vs Minnesota Golden Gophers W 67 - 54
2026-01-21 vs Penn State Lady Lions W 81 - 65
2026-01-25 @ Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 76 - 48
2026-01-28 @ Maryland Terrapins W 83 - 80
2026-02-01 vs Illinois Fighting Illini L 66 - 75
2026-02-05 vs Ohio State Buckeyes L 60 - 70
2026-02-08 @ Wisconsin Badgers W 91 - 86
2026-02-11 @ Iowa Hawkeyes L 56 - 65
2026-02-15 vs Oregon Ducks W 51 - 43
2026-02-19 @ UCLA Bruins L 67 - 82
2026-02-22 vs Nebraska Cornhuskers L 65 - 66
2026-03-01 @ Oregon Ducks W 70 - 69
2026-03-05 vs USC Trojans W 76 - 64
2026-03-06 @ UCLA Bruins L 60 - 78
2026-03-20 vs South Dakota State Jackrabbits W 72 - 54
2026-03-22 @ TCU Horned Frogs L 59 - 62

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Sellers S. Sellers G 32 32.4 17.9 2.9 3.9 1.5 0.8 3.3 14.1 9.6 104 4.5 5.9 46.7 35.6 82.5 0.63 58.2 54.8
A. Howell A. Howell G 32 34.8 14.1 8.4 1.5 1.4 0.4 1.3 9.8 14.7 110 4.8 6.5 50.0 42.0 76.0 1.49 65.2 63.0
E. Ladine E. Ladine G 27 27.9 9.9 5.0 2.1 0.4 0.4 1.8 9.6 6.3 63 3.7 6.1 39.6 31.5 78.8 -0.14 48.6 46.3
B. McGaughy B. McGaughy F 32 21.4 9.5 4.3 1.2 0.4 1.0 1.6 8.3 6.5 80 3.6 8.4 48.1 18.5 70.0 2.42 51.8 49.1
H. Stines H. Stines G 32 28.4 6.8 4.3 2.3 1.1 0.4 1.4 7.5 6.1 118 5.1 8.4 37.2 27.3 65.4 1.27 43.1 41.6
Y. Grabovskaia Y. Grabovskaia C 32 14.6 4.3 4.6 1.3 0.6 0.4 1.4 4.0 5.8 55 2.4 5.7 46.9 0 67.9 2.54 49.5 46.9
D. Coppinger D. Coppinger G 32 17.9 3.9 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.9 3.3 3.1 108 4.9 11.1 43.4 28.3 65.5 1.97 52.2 49.5
S. Harvey S. Harvey G 25 10.3 3.3 1.7 0.7 0.1 0.0 1.4 3.1 1.3 66 3.1 9.4 41.0 33.3 73.7 0.56 48.1 44.2
C. Briggs C. Briggs G 25 11.7 1.9 1.7 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.6 1.6 2.4 67 3.5 11.1 30.0 26.3 72.0 0.68 46.1 36.2
T. Brown T. Brown G 27 12.0 1.4 1.4 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.5 1.6 1.8 96 4.8 10.8 36.4 12.5 55.6 2.92 39.6 37.5
O. Anderson O. Anderson F 9 3.7 1.3 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.6 1.4 1.2 23 2.6 16.4 38.5 25.0 25.0 -0.31 40.7 42.3
N. Cain N. Cain F 8 4.1 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.2 34 3.8 36.7 66.7 0 100.0 2.11 77.3 66.7
S. Gillmer S. Gillmer F 11 4.3 0.5 1.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 1.3 42 4.2 33.1 28.6 0.0 100.0 2.81 38.1 28.6
Daniella McLean Daniella McLean F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG