Wake Forest
2021 Team Stats (7 games)
64.0
PPG
77.6
Opp
-12.0
Margin
40.6%
FG%
35.3%
3P%
68.4%
FT%
30.6
RPG
10.7
APG
14.3
TO
75.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1317 (#76) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1365 (#73) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.6 (#43) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.127 (#92) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.103 (#66) | NetEff -19.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.167 (#94) | AdjNet -13.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.166 (#94) | AdjNet -14.0 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-16 | vs | Virginia Cavaliers | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-06 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 61 - 70 |
| 2021-01-09 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 68 - 79 |
| 2021-01-13 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | L | 65 - 77 |
| 2021-01-17 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 60 - 64 |
| 2021-02-13 | @ | Florida State Seminoles | L | 85 - 92 |
| 2021-02-27 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 46 - 84 |
| 2021-03-05 | vs | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | L | 63 - 75 |
| 2021-03-09 | @ | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 77 - 80 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Williamson
|
- | 8 | 35.8 | 13.2 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 10.1 | 6.5 | -9 | -0.6 | -0.8 | 46.9 | 35.5 | 82.6 | 0.09 | 58.2 | 53.7 |
I. DuBose
|
C | 4 | 25.5 | 12.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 7.5 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 44.4 | 62.5 | - | 67.5 | 66.7 |
I. Massoud
|
- | 8 | 21.8 | 9.5 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 7.9 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 37.5 | 65.0 | - | 52.9 | 50.0 |
I. Mucius
|
F | 8 | 28.4 | 9.0 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 9.2 | 5.6 | - | - | - | 33.8 | 28.6 | 73.7 | - | 43.7 | 39.2 |
J. Antonio
|
G | 8 | 20.4 | 7.9 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 5.4 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 44.2 | 47.4 | 100.0 | - | 68.4 | 65.1 |
Oguama, Ody
|
- | 8 | 22.0 | 6.4 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 42.2 | 0 | 52.0 | - | 45.5 | 42.2 |
Carter Whitt
|
- | 7 | 24.3 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 35.3 | 66.7 | - | 43.2 | 41.3 |
J. Johnson
|
G | 8 | 14.2 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 34 | 3.8 | 9.0 | 35.7 | 31.6 | 77.8 | 0.53 | 51.6 | 46.4 |
J. Neath
|
G | 6 | 14.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 27.8 | 18.2 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
I. Wilkins
|
- | 5 | 10.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 45.5 | 44.4 |
Q. Adams
|
- | 5 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 35.4 | 33.3 |
Emmanuel Okpomo
|
- | 4 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.01 | 106.4 | 100.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG