Vermont Catamounts
2023 Team Stats (4 games)
58.8
PPG
65.6
Opp
-8.8
Margin
40.5%
FG%
32.1%
3P%
60.5%
FT%
33.3
RPG
12.8
APG
10.3
TO
71.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1282 (#31) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1207 (#79) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.9 (#136) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.857 (#52) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-08 | @ | Indiana Hoosiers | L | 49 - 86 |
| 2022-11-26 | vs | Stonehill Skyhawks | W | 70 - 48 |
| 2023-03-05 | vs | UMBC Retrievers | W | 75 - 63 |
| 2023-03-10 | vs | UAlbany Great Danes | W | 38 - 36 |
| 2023-03-18 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 52 - 95 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Utterback
|
G | 4 | 37.0 | 17.0 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 16.8 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 41.8 | 21.4 | 60.0 | - | 46.2 | 44.0 |
A. Olson
|
F | 4 | 29.8 | 9.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | - | - | - | 47.2 | 0.0 | 71.4 | - | 49.9 | 47.2 |
C. Gilwee
|
G | 4 | 36.0 | 9.8 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 12.0 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 29.2 | 32.1 | 33.3 | - | 38.5 | 38.5 |
M. Myklebust
|
F | 4 | 16.0 | 7.5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 55.6 | 100.0 | - | 67.6 | 62.5 |
D. Richason
|
F | 4 | 27.0 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 29.4 | 50.0 | - | 46.8 | 45.7 |
C. Celaya
|
G | 1 | 19.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | - | 106.4 | 150.0 |
B. Vito
|
G | 4 | 24.8 | 2.8 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 55.7 | 55.6 |
A. Dizon
|
F | 3 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 40.0 | 40.0 |
A. Matic
|
G | 2 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
P. Gonzalez
|
G | 4 | 13.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
C. Whiteside
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M. McDonald
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
K. Hanson
|
G | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Priede
|
C | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG