Vermont Catamounts
2009 Team Stats (7 games)
66.9
PPG
58.5
Opp
+8.1
Margin
41.3%
FG%
32.6%
3P%
78.6%
FT%
32.0
RPG
11.3
APG
0.0
TO
66.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1213 (#63) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 978 (#260) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +12.6 (#270) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.234 (#332) | - |
2009 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-11-14 | vs | Massachusetts Minutewomen | W | 83 - 69 |
| 2008-11-22 | vs | Quinnipiac Bobcats | L | 53 - 72 |
| 2008-11-23 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2008-11-26 | vs | Providence Friars | W | 73 - 67 |
| 2008-11-28 | @ | Manhattan Jaspers | W | 69 - 50 |
| 2008-11-30 | @ | St. John's Red Storm | L | 58 - 70 |
| 2008-12-06 | vs | Holy Cross Crusaders | W | 71 - 53 |
| 2008-12-11 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 67 - 69 |
| 2008-12-14 | vs | Kent State Golden Flashes | L | 71 - 77 |
| 2008-12-21 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | L | 56 - 67 |
| 2008-12-29 | @ | Florida Gators | L | 76 - 85 |
| 2008-12-30 | vs | Towson Tigers | L | 48 - 51 |
| 2009-01-04 | vs | North Dakota Fighting Hawks | W | 63 - 49 |
| 2009-01-07 | vs | UMBC Retrievers | W | 81 - 52 |
| 2009-01-10 | @ | Boston University Terriers | L | 47 - 58 |
| 2009-01-14 | vs | Stony Brook Seawolves | W | 77 - 42 |
| 2009-01-17 | @ | UAlbany Great Danes | W | 77 - 54 |
| 2009-01-21 | vs | Maine Black Bears | W | 86 - 51 |
| 2009-01-27 | vs | Hartford Hawks | L | 52 - 56 |
| 2009-02-01 | @ | New Hampshire Wildcats | W | 69 - 48 |
| 2009-02-04 | @ | Binghamton Bearcats | W | 64 - 38 |
| 2009-02-07 | vs | Boston University Terriers | L | 61 - 64 |
| 2009-02-11 | @ | UMBC Retrievers | W | 73 - 49 |
| 2009-02-14 | vs | UAlbany Great Danes | W | 48 - 32 |
| 2009-02-17 | @ | Stony Brook Seawolves | W | 69 - 53 |
| 2009-02-22 | vs | New Hampshire Wildcats | W | 70 - 48 |
| 2009-02-25 | @ | Maine Black Bears | W | 61 - 44 |
| 2009-03-04 | @ | Hartford Hawks | L | 47 - 57 |
| 2009-03-07 | vs | Binghamton Bearcats | W | 84 - 57 |
| 2009-03-13 | vs | New Hampshire Wildcats | W | 57 - 45 |
| 2009-03-14 | @ | Hartford Hawks | W | 66 - 56 |
| 2009-03-15 | @ | Boston University Terriers | W | 74 - 66 |
| 2009-03-22 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 65 - 104 |
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Trimboli
|
- | 4 | 35.0 | 18.8 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 10.5 | 18.2 | - | - | - | 54.8 | 35.0 | 78.6 | - | 69.0 | 63.1 |
C. Pilypaitis
|
G | 7 | 0.0 | 17.4 | 8.7 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 4.9 | 12.4 | 14.9 | - | - | - | 43.7 | 39.4 | 91.7 | - | 59.3 | 51.1 |
M. Kotsopoulos
|
G | 7 | 0.0 | 17.1 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 13.4 | 8.4 | - | - | - | 40.4 | 30.4 | 74.0 | - | 51.7 | 44.1 |
C. McIntosh
|
- | 4 | 31.2 | 15.8 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 11.8 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 53.2 | 60.0 | 71.4 | - | 59.3 | 56.4 |
M. Blakely
|
- | 4 | 31.5 | 15.2 | 7.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 15.5 | - | - | - | 58.8 | 0 | 44.7 | - | 55.8 | 58.8 |
N. Vier
|
- | 4 | 26.2 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 52.9 | 50.0 | 64.3 | - | 66.9 | 64.7 |
S. Janousek
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 7.0 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 46.4 | 16.7 | 0 | - | 48.2 | 48.2 |
A. Rosenkrantz
|
G | 7 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 6.9 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 22.2 | 60.0 | - | 39.4 | 35.4 |
A. Sheftic
|
F | 7 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 5.6 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 53.8 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 54.5 | 53.8 |
G. Young
|
- | 4 | 22.5 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 4.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 33.3 | - | 54.8 | 56.2 |
J. Accaoui
|
- | 4 | 12.5 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 44.4 | 100.0 | - | 70.5 | 63.6 |
E. Fjeld
|
- | 4 | 15.8 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 6.5 | - | - | - | 62.5 | 0 | 71.4 | - | 67.7 | 62.5 |
M. Joseph
|
- | 4 | 19.0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 12.5 | 80.0 | - | 24.7 | 15.6 |
T. Young
|
F | 1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
J. Dean
|
- | 2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 106.4 | 100.0 |
G. Kissel
|
- | 3 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 82.0 | 100.0 |
J. Clarke
|
- | 3 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
S. Iwobi
|
G | 2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
R. Shields
|
- | 2 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
P. Bergmann
|
- | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
G. Hughes
|
- | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG