Vanderbilt Commodores
2013 Team Stats (11 games)
58.5
PPG
64.3
Opp
-5.8
Margin
39.4%
FG%
30.9%
3P%
70.8%
FT%
31.5
RPG
13.6
APG
17.1
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.3
Adj PPG
49.2
Adj Opp PPG
#25
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1386 (#24) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1282 (#29) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1094 (#59) | HCA +72 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +19.4 (#24) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +19.5 (#21) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.822 (#49) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.973 (#24) | AdjNet +31.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.975 (#25) | AdjNet +31.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.839 (#25) | AdjO 67.3 | AdjD 49.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.744 (#31) | AdjO 62.7 | AdjD 51.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.882 (#24) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.869 (#24) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1262 (#31) | RD 115 | GP 31 |
2013 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-11-10 | vs | McNeese Cowgirls | W | 82 - 71 |
| 2012-11-12 | @ | Lipscomb Bisons | W | 62 - 45 |
| 2012-11-15 | vs | UAB Blazers | W | 69 - 54 |
| 2012-11-18 | @ | Dayton Flyers | L | 66 - 71 |
| 2012-11-28 | vs | Austin Peay Governors | W | 67 - 36 |
| 2012-12-01 | vs | Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles | W | 77 - 50 |
| 2012-12-04 | @ | Western Kentucky Lady Toppers | W | 77 - 67 |
| 2012-12-06 | vs | Hartford Hawks | W | 67 - 45 |
| 2012-12-16 | @ | Oklahoma Sooners | W | 76 - 63 |
| 2012-12-22 | vs | Charleston Cougars | W | 69 - 44 |
| 2012-12-29 | @ | USC Trojans | W | 74 - 56 |
| 2013-01-03 | vs | Mississippi State Bulldogs | W | 92 - 41 |
| 2013-01-06 | @ | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 76 - 57 |
| 2013-01-10 | @ | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 48 - 64 |
| 2013-01-13 | vs | Arkansas Razorbacks | W | 78 - 58 |
| 2013-01-20 | @ | LSU Tigers | L | 51 - 54 |
| 2013-01-24 | vs | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | L | 75 - 83 |
| 2013-01-27 | @ | Alabama Crimson Tide | W | 67 - 58 |
| 2013-01-31 | @ | Texas A&M Aggies | L | 52 - 60 |
| 2013-02-03 | vs | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 79 - 53 |
| 2013-02-10 | vs | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 53 - 75 |
| 2013-02-14 | vs | Missouri Tigers | W | 62 - 46 |
| 2013-02-17 | @ | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | L | 64 - 83 |
| 2013-02-21 | @ | Florida Gators | W | 68 - 57 |
| 2013-02-24 | vs | Texas A&M Aggies | W | 61 - 51 |
| 2013-02-28 | vs | Auburn Tigers | W | 59 - 44 |
| 2013-03-03 | @ | Georgia Lady Bulldogs | L | 50 - 55 |
| 2013-03-07 | vs | Missouri Tigers | W | 53 - 40 |
| 2013-03-08 | @ | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 65 - 76 |
| 2013-03-23 | vs | Saint Joseph's Hawks | W | 60 - 54 |
| 2013-03-25 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 44 - 77 |
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Clarke
|
NA | 11 | 0.0 | 16.1 | 7.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 13.5 | 9.5 | 192 | 29 | 6.6 | 10.9 | 47.0 | 0 | 66.1 | 5.56 | 51.0 | 47.0 |
C. Foggie
|
G | 8 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 12.5 | 4.2 | 105 | 23 | 4.6 | 6.5 | 36.0 | 25.5 | 75.0 | 0.12 | 45.5 | 42.0 |
C. Brown
|
C | 11 | 0.0 | 11.3 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 11.5 | 4.7 | 154 | 29 | 5.3 | 6.4 | 34.9 | 40.0 | 90.0 | 0.68 | 46.0 | 42.1 |
K. Schrann
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 7.2 | 136 | 19 | 7.2 | 13.1 | 55.6 | 60.0 | 85.7 | 1.99 | 68.8 | 63.9 |
H. Bowe
|
F | 5 | 0.0 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 7.2 | 5.6 | 10 | 29 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | -1.41 | 44.4 | 44.4 |
E. Brown
|
NA | 11 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 173 | 29 | 6.0 | 9.5 | 28.1 | 26.1 | 65.4 | 4.91 | 39.1 | 32.8 |
M. Batey
|
G | 2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 80 | 26 | 3.1 | 8.5 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 3.62 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
G. Smith
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 62 | 26 | 2.4 | 10.6 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.7 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG