🐻⬇️🏀

Utah

Season: 2026 2024
Also known as: Utah
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1032 (#174) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1051 (#193) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1014 (#289) HCA +75 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +23.7 (#65) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.995 (#99) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +52.9 More → 0.998 (#26) AdjNet +52.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +54.0 More → 0.998 (#29) AdjNet +54.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 94.2 | AdjD 54.6 More → 0.973 (#12) AdjO 94.2 | AdjD 54.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 62.4 More → 0.598 (#173) AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 62.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.857 (#55) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.818 (#75) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 1088 (#150) RD 350 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs Sioux Falls W 88 - 62

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Evelina Otto - 1 18.2 15.0 9.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 17.0 - - - 71.4 0 83.3 - 77.8 71.4
Avery Hjelmstad - 1 21.9 14.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 11.0 5.0 - - - 36.4 44.4 100.0 - 58.9 54.5
Kamryn Mafua - 1 18.4 9.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 4.0 - - - 42.9 33.3 100.0 - 57.1 50.0
Brooke Walker - 1 19.1 9.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 10.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 0 - 112.5 112.5
Maty Wilke - 1 22.5 9.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 - - - 30.0 25.0 100.0 - 43.1 40.0
Lani White - 1 19.7 8.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 6.0 24 1.8 10.8 28.6 0.0 80.0 2.12 43.5 28.6
Reese Ross - 1 18.2 8.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 12.0 - - - 100.0 0 100.0 - 103.1 100.0
Grace Foster - 1 12.8 5.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 - - - 25.0 33.3 100.0 - 51.2 37.5
Sam Crispe - 1 18.7 5.0 7.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 13.0 - - - 50.0 0 75.0 - 66.5 50.0
Alyssa Blanck - 1 6.5 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 75.0 75.0
LA Sneed - 1 24.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 7.0 0.0 - - - 14.3 0.0 50.0 - 19.0 14.3

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG