๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

UTEP

Also known as: UTEP Miners, UTEP
Program History

2018 Team Stats (1 games)

58.0
PPG
71.0
Opp
-13.0
Margin
36.7%
FG%
18.5%
3P%
69.2%
FT%
34.0
RPG
9.0
APG
8.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
64.8
Adj PPG
70.0
Adj Opp PPG
#242
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2017-2018
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 898 (#228) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 843 (#285) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More โ†’ 953 (#243) HCA +95 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ -5.3 (#239) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ -3.2 (#217) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.299 (#274) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -7.1 More โ†’ 0.306 (#237) AdjNet -7.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -7.3 More โ†’ 0.301 (#236) AdjNet -7.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 70.0 More โ†’ 0.384 (#242) AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 70.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.6 | AdjD 69.1 More โ†’ 0.420 (#250) AdjO 65.6 | AdjD 69.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.376 (#233) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.383 (#231) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 138 | GP 30 More โ†’ 886 (#247) RD 138 | GP 30

2018 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2017-11-10 vs Louisiana Christian Wildcats W 100 - 50
2017-11-16 vs Boise State Broncos L 56 - 58
2017-11-17 vs South Carolina Gamecocks L 56 - 80
2017-11-19 @ App State Mountaineers L 72 - 76
2017-11-25 @ New Mexico State Aggies L 63 - 72
2017-11-27 vs Lamar Cardinals L 52 - 66
2017-11-30 vs New Mexico State Aggies L 60 - 80
2017-12-02 vs New Mexico Lobos W 88 - 76
2017-12-09 vs Washington State Cougars W 76 - 69
2017-12-19 vs Incarnate Word Cardinals W 72 - 66
2017-12-21 vs Howard Bison W 69 - 56
2017-12-22 vs North Dakota State Bison L 51 - 63
2017-12-28 vs North Texas Mean Green L 62 - 63
2017-12-30 vs Rice Owls W 80 - 62
2018-01-04 @ Southern Miss Golden Eagles L 75 - 85
2018-01-06 @ Louisiana Tech Bulldogs L 88 - 97
2018-01-11 vs Florida Atlantic Owls L 66 - 73
2018-01-13 vs Florida International Panthers W 72 - 68
2018-01-20 @ UTSA Roadrunners L 61 - 65
2018-01-25 @ UAB Blazers L 78 - 85
2018-01-27 @ Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders L 50 - 81
2018-02-01 vs Western Kentucky Hilltoppers L 60 - 72
2018-02-03 vs Marshall Thundering Herd L 65 - 74
2018-02-10 vs UTSA Roadrunners L 59 - 63
2018-02-15 @ Charlotte 49ers W 87 - 86
2018-02-17 @ Old Dominion Monarchs L 33 - 82
2018-02-22 vs Louisiana Tech Bulldogs W 74 - 72
2018-02-24 vs Southern Miss Golden Eagles W 73 - 44
2018-03-01 @ Rice Owls L 70 - 76
2018-03-03 @ North Texas Mean Green W 68 - 66
2018-03-07 @ UTSA Roadrunners L 58 - 71

2018 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Evan Gilyard Evan Gilyard - 1 36.0 29.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 25.0 6.0 -63 25 -2.5 -5.5 40.0 27.3 100.0 -0.63 52.5 46.0
Omega Harris Omega Harris G 24 33.2 12.4 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.1 1.3 1.5 16.6 -79 25 -3.2 -4.3 44.4 40.0 75.0 1.19 359.7 55.6
Keith Frazier Keith Frazier G 14 24.4 12.3 5.1 1.1 0.6 0.3 1.7 0.2 17.5 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 2866.7 0.0
Isiah Osborne Isiah Osborne G 24 26.9 9.4 3.7 1.1 0.7 0.1 1.0 2.1 11.9 -109 23 -4.7 -8.2 38.0 26.7 64.7 -2.87 196.6 46.0
Paul Thomas Paul Thomas F 24 25.3 8.6 5.6 1.3 0.4 0.3 1.7 1.2 13.2 -79 25 -3.2 -5.6 58.6 100.0 42.9 -0.88 321.1 60.3
Matt Willms Matt Willms C 19 22.2 8.0 5.1 0.7 0.3 1.2 1.7 0.7 12.8 -5 18 -0.3 -0.6 57.1 0 60.0 0.36 469.1 57.1
Trey Wade Trey Wade F 19 18.1 6.8 4.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.6 1.5 10.5 -74 20 -3.7 -8.6 53.6 20.0 0.0 -1.12 226.8 55.4
Kobe Magee Kobe Magee G 22 19.9 4.4 1.9 2.0 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.5 7.0 -58 24 -2.4 -5.6 18.2 14.3 0 -0.97 440.9 22.7
Tirus Smith Tirus Smith - 17 11.7 3.9 2.5 0.2 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.3 6.0 - - - - 40.0 0 0 - 670.0 40.0
Trey Touchet Trey Touchet G 20 10.8 1.9 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.3 2.6 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 325.0 0.0
Jake Flaggert Jake Flaggert F 22 12.5 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.8 -47 23 -2.0 -7.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 -0.11 309.3 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG