UMBC Retrievers
2009 Team Stats (1 games)
88.0
PPG
73.5
Opp
-4.1
Margin
38.2%
FG%
41.7%
3P%
77.4%
FT%
35.0
RPG
9.0
APG
0.0
TO
78.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 888 (#569) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 871 (#589) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +9.0 (#311) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.271 (#306) | - |
2009 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-11-15 | @ | George Washington Revolutionaries | L | 56 - 75 |
| 2008-11-19 | vs | George Mason Patriots | W | 89 - 60 |
| 2008-11-21 | @ | Northern Illinois Huskies | W | 88 - 73 |
| 2008-11-22 | @ | Seton Hall Pirates | L | 70 - 81 |
| 2008-11-29 | vs | Western Michigan Broncos | W | 81 - 69 |
| 2008-11-30 | @ | Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks | W | 92 - 70 |
| 2008-12-03 | vs | Navy Midshipmen | W | 85 - 77 |
| 2008-12-06 | vs | Towson Tigers | W | 69 - 68 |
| 2008-12-08 | vs | Coppin State Eagles | W | 76 - 63 |
| 2008-12-18 | @ | James Madison Dukes | L | 63 - 104 |
| 2008-12-21 | vs | Loyola Maryland Greyhounds | L | 76 - 80 |
| 2008-12-28 | vs | Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters | L | 62 - 83 |
| 2008-12-29 | @ | Rider Broncs | W | 76 - 55 |
| 2009-01-07 | @ | Vermont Catamounts | L | 52 - 81 |
| 2009-01-10 | vs | New Hampshire Wildcats | W | 95 - 85 |
| 2009-01-13 | @ | Hartford Hawks | L | 52 - 85 |
| 2009-01-17 | vs | Maine Black Bears | W | 68 - 58 |
| 2009-01-21 | vs | UAlbany Great Danes | W | 76 - 63 |
| 2009-01-24 | vs | Binghamton Bearcats | W | 78 - 63 |
| 2009-01-28 | @ | Boston University Terriers | L | 57 - 84 |
| 2009-01-31 | @ | Stony Brook Seawolves | L | 62 - 78 |
| 2009-02-08 | @ | New Hampshire Wildcats | L | 65 - 73 |
| 2009-02-11 | vs | Vermont Catamounts | L | 49 - 73 |
| 2009-02-15 | @ | Maine Black Bears | W | 77 - 74 |
| 2009-02-18 | vs | Hartford Hawks | L | 43 - 72 |
| 2009-02-21 | vs | Stony Brook Seawolves | W | 77 - 58 |
| 2009-02-25 | @ | UAlbany Great Danes | L | 80 - 92 |
| 2009-02-28 | @ | Binghamton Bearcats | L | 50 - 70 |
| 2009-03-04 | vs | Boston University Terriers | L | 65 - 73 |
| 2009-03-13 | @ | Binghamton Bearcats | L | 54 - 66 |
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Cassidy
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 14.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 25.0 | 90.0 | - | 54.3 | 39.3 |
D. Proctor
|
- | 5 | 39.0 | 17.8 | 9.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 15.4 | 14.4 | - | - | - | 50.6 | 16.7 | 50.0 | - | 51.9 | 51.3 |
M. Colabella
|
F | 1 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 56.4 | 37.5 |
M. Kurowski
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 50.6 | 50.0 |
R. Flemming
|
- | 4 | 26.2 | 11.0 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 9.8 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 43.6 | 0 | 62.5 | - | 47.8 | 43.6 |
J. Greene
|
- | 5 | 39.0 | 10.0 | 2.4 | 7.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 | - | - | - | 37.8 | 32.4 | 100.0 | - | 53.5 | 51.1 |
C. Gilliam
|
- | 5 | 28.0 | 10.0 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 7.6 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 55.3 | 33.3 | 87.5 | - | 60.2 | 56.6 |
M. Spadafora
|
- | 5 | 32.6 | 7.6 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 4.4 | - | - | - | 32.5 | 22.2 | 76.9 | - | 41.6 | 35.0 |
J. Fry
|
- | 5 | 33.6 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 24.4 | 16.7 | 70.0 | - | 35.1 | 25.6 |
E. Brown
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
M. Brokans
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 100.0 | 50.0 | - | 51.5 | 50.0 |
J. Wasco
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
M. Tamares
|
- | 1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
B. Burrier
|
- | 2 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
B. Smith
|
- | 2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG