UConn Huskies
2020 Team Stats (20 games)
79.8
PPG
51.6
Opp
+28.2
Margin
49.8%
FG%
39.9%
3P%
70.5%
FT%
43.0
RPG
18.8
APG
14.1
TO
82.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1678 (#1) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1654 (#2) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +63.2 (#1) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.993 (#3) | - |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | vs | California Golden Bears | W | 72 - 61 |
| 2019-11-13 | @ | Vanderbilt Commodores | W | 64 - 51 |
| 2019-11-17 | @ | Temple Owls | W | 83 - 54 |
| 2019-11-19 | vs | Virginia Cavaliers | W | 83 - 44 |
| 2019-11-24 | @ | Ohio State Buckeyes | W | 73 - 62 |
| 2019-11-26 | @ | Dayton Flyers | W | 75 - 37 |
| 2019-12-05 | @ | Seton Hall Pirates | W | 92 - 78 |
| 2019-12-16 | @ | DePaul Blue Demons | W | 84 - 74 |
| 2019-12-22 | vs | Oklahoma Sooners | W | 97 - 53 |
| 2020-01-02 | vs | Wichita State Shockers | W | 83 - 55 |
| 2020-01-14 | @ | Memphis Tigers | W | 68 - 56 |
| 2020-01-16 | @ | UCF Knights | W | 59 - 52 |
| 2020-01-19 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 92 - 34 |
| 2020-02-16 | @ | South Florida Bulls | W | 67 - 47 |
| 2020-02-19 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | W | 74 - 31 |
| 2020-02-22 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 66 - 53 |
| 2020-02-26 | @ | Cincinnati Bearcats | W | 105 - 58 |
| 2020-02-29 | @ | Houston Cougars | W | 92 - 40 |
| 2020-03-02 | vs | South Florida Bulls | W | 80 - 39 |
| 2020-03-09 | vs | Cincinnati Bearcats | W | 87 - 53 |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Megan Walker
|
- | 20 | 34.7 | 21.1 | 8.3 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 15.7 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 51.0 | 49.0 | 85.0 | 1.36 | 62.0 | 59.1 |
Crystal Dangerfield
|
- | 18 | 36.3 | 14.6 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 11.7 | 10.9 | - | - | - | 46.0 | 41.2 | 89.7 | 1.0 | 58.5 | 55.9 |
Courtney Williams
|
G | 20 | 36.0 | 14.4 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 12.2 | 9.9 | - | - | - | 46.5 | 30.9 | 74.0 | 1.39 | 54.3 | 51.6 |
O. Nelson-Ododa
|
- | 20 | 28.6 | 11.6 | 8.9 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 9.2 | 16.4 | - | - | - | 56.8 | 0.0 | 51.1 | 0.4 | 57.0 | 56.8 |
A. Makurat
|
G | 20 | 25.8 | 8.5 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 6.8 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 45.9 | 41.4 | 76.9 | 0.19 | 60.4 | 59.3 |
A. Griffin
|
F | 20 | 14.6 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 4.2 | 8.8 | 210 | 7.2 | 37.0 | 55.4 | 16.7 | 60.8 | 2.96 | 58.8 | 56.0 |
K. Irwin
|
F | 17 | 18.2 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 57.9 | 44.4 | 66.7 | 0.53 | 73.8 | 73.7 |
M. Bent
|
G | 17 | 8.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 27.3 | 100.0 | 1.64 | 48.2 | 45.7 |
B. Camara
|
F | 6 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.18 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
E. Adebayo
|
F | 13 | 5.9 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 16.7 | 0.51 | 35.6 | 40.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG