🐻⬇️🏀

UC Merced Bobcats

Season: 2026 2025
Also known as: UC Merced Bobcats
Program History

2025 Team Stats (1 games)

40.0
PPG
72.0
Opp
-32.0
Margin
25.0%
FG%
15.0%
3P%
75.0%
FT%
34.0
RPG
5.0
APG
22.0
TO
83.3
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 992 (#371) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → -23.3 (#509) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 66.0 More → 0.413 (#433) AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 66.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.191 (#453) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.226 (#458) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 854 (#492) RD 350 | GP 1

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2024-11-06 @ Cal Poly Mustangs L 40 - 72

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
L. Blecha L. Blecha G 1 35.0 12.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.0 15.0 -3.0 - - - 26.7 18.2 100.0 - 37.8 33.3
J. Beltran J. Beltran G 1 27.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 7.0 -2.0 - - - 57.1 50.0 0 - 64.3 64.3
N. Lukito N. Lukito F 1 33.0 7.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 6.0 - - - 42.9 0 100.0 - 47.0 42.9
M. Flores M. Flores G 1 13.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 - - - 20.0 0.0 80.0 - 41.7 20.0
S. Nagra S. Nagra G 1 20.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 0.0 - - - 11.1 0.0 50.0 - 15.2 11.1
E. LeBeau E. LeBeau G 1 5.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
S. Boyd S. Boyd G 1 9.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0 50.0 - 17.4 0.0
G. Martini G. Martini G 1 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 -3.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
P. Ramirez P. Ramirez F 1 28.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
M. Diaz M. Diaz G 1 12.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Q. Godfrey Q. Godfrey C 1 11.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG