UC Davis
2021 Team Stats (4 games)
64.5
PPG
70.0
Opp
-5.5
Margin
46.8%
FG%
25.8%
3P%
84.7%
FT%
26.5
RPG
9.3
APG
14.3
TO
72.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1215 (#132) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1195 (#175) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.2 (#206) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.392 (#54) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.207 (#89) | AdjNet -11.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.206 (#89) | AdjNet -11.7 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-27 | @ | Cal State Bakersfield Roadrunners | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-01 | vs | UC Riverside Highlanders | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-05 | @ | Cal State Northridge Matadors | L | 77 - 80 |
| 2021-03-05 | vs | Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors | L | 68 - 73 |
| 2021-03-11 | vs | Cal State Bakersfield Roadrunners | W | 58 - 56 |
| 2021-03-12 | @ | UC Santa Barbara Gauchos | L | 55 - 71 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Manjon
|
- | 4 | 34.5 | 15.2 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 11.5 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 47.8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | - | 57.5 | 48.9 |
E. Pepper
|
- | 4 | 36.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 43.8 | 83.3 | - | 51.3 | 49.0 |
C. Fuller
|
- | 4 | 23.5 | 12.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 8.5 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 20.0 | 84.2 | - | 60.2 | 51.5 |
C. Anigwe
|
- | 4 | 21.0 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 6.2 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 64.0 | 0.0 | 85.7 | - | 67.7 | 64.0 |
D. Squire
|
G | 3 | 31.0 | 8.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 6.0 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 61.1 | 40.0 | 100.0 | - | 68.9 | 66.7 |
K. Koehler
|
F | 4 | 26.5 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 46.0 | 44.4 |
C. Ba
|
G | 1 | 36.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 16.7 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
B.J. Shaw
|
G | 3 | 8.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 51.0 | 40.0 |
Adebayo, Ade
|
- | 3 | 14.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
A. Murphy
|
F | 4 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
F. Borra
|
- | 3 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. McGill
|
F | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
R. Pehka
|
G | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG