UC Clermont
Season:
2026
Also known as: UC Clermont
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 957 (#395) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 889 (#443) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 974 (#514) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -35.4 (#663) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.049 (#564) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.042 (#636) | AdjNet -27.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.040 (#635) | AdjNet -27.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.137 (#659) | AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 86.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.330 (#591) | AdjO 64.1 | AdjD 71.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.100 (#651) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.132 (#645) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 832 (#443) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-01 | vs | Salem (WV) | L | 75 - 97 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Scott | - | 1 | 39.0 | 30.0 | 13.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 22.0 | 22.0 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 33.3 | 92.3 | - | 54.1 | 40.9 |
| Elise Cupp | - | 1 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 17.0 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 61.8 | 58.3 |
| Keara Brooks | - | 1 | 36.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 50.0 | 0.0 | - | 58.3 | 61.1 |
| McKaila Hatton | - | 1 | 37.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 40.0 | 75.0 | - | 51.4 | 42.9 |
| Alexis Neal | - | 1 | 29.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 44.3 | 33.3 |
| Octavia Kelch | - | 1 | 25.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 22.2 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG