🐻⬇️🏀

U New England

Also known as: U New England
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1003 (#240) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1006 (#323) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1104 (#91) HCA +62 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → +0.0 (#190) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +2.5 (#328) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.704 (#363) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +1.6 More → 0.553 (#342) NetEff +1.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +3.5 More → 0.599 (#347) AdjNet +3.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +3.1 More → 0.590 (#348) AdjNet +3.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 63.3 | AdjD 61.7 More → 0.536 (#348) AdjO 63.3 | AdjD 61.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.5 | AdjD 55.0 More → 0.643 (#185) AdjO 61.5 | AdjD 55.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.629 (#274) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.648 (#261) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 104 | GP 21 More → 1127 (#125) RD 104 | GP 21

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-12 @ Southern Me. L 58 - 76
2025-11-17 vs Clark (MA) L 58 - 61
2025-11-19 vs St. Joseph's (ME) W 73 - 50
2025-11-22 vs Wesleyan (CT) W 57 - 48
2025-11-23 vs Emerson L 61 - 72
2025-11-25 @ WPI L 47 - 58
2025-11-30 @ Bates L 56 - 88
2025-12-03 vs Gordon W 84 - 43
2025-12-20 @ Wash. & Lee L 33 - 68
2026-01-10 @ Western New Eng. W 66 - 54
2026-01-17 @ JWU (Providence) L 52 - 64
2026-01-20 vs Wentworth W 85 - 32
2026-01-24 @ Nichols W 56 - 42
2026-01-28 vs Curry W 71 - 57
2026-01-31 vs Roger Williams W 68 - 42
2026-02-03 @ Gordon W 60 - 45
2026-02-07 @ Hartford W 60 - 50

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Sydney Jenisch - 17 26.6 12.4 3.5 1.2 1.3 0.0 1.6 12.2 4.5 134 7.4 43.1 38.9 31.1 75.0 2.7 46.8 43.5
Maddy Werner - 10 18.0 7.7 3.9 0.6 0.7 0.4 1.5 8.0 3.8 80 6.7 35.4 31.2 20.0 78.1 1.35 40.9 32.5
Ella Karavanic - 9 18.1 7.2 3.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.9 7.4 3.0 - - - 41.8 41.2 66.7 - 47.6 47.0
Grace Boucher - 17 28.4 6.3 2.1 2.2 0.9 0.1 1.3 4.5 5.7 154 8.6 42.5 41.6 36.0 86.2 0.98 59.6 53.2
Kaia Anderson - 16 18.6 6.3 4.6 1.1 0.9 0.0 1.4 6.4 5.1 76 4.5 36.7 38.8 27.3 71.4 1.0 45.0 41.7
Emily Picher - 17 14.6 6.0 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.1 1.2 6.2 2.6 44 2.4 28.6 36.8 20.7 62.1 0.01 42.9 39.6
Gabby Soter - 17 24.0 4.9 4.9 1.8 1.5 0.1 0.9 4.9 7.4 156 8.7 45.2 29.8 21.7 82.1 3.86 43.1 35.7
Paige Meda - 17 16.9 4.6 2.2 0.8 0.5 0.1 1.0 4.8 2.5 62 3.4 38.4 30.9 14.3 67.6 0.1 40.1 32.7
Hannah Blanchard - 17 16.2 4.6 3.5 0.6 0.6 0.3 1.1 5.0 3.6 34 1.9 26.2 36.5 18.5 75.0 -2.74 42.9 39.4
Hannah Cook - 17 13.1 3.6 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4 2.6 3.6 85 4.2 47.7 40.9 48.3 91.7 2.67 61.9 56.8
Aisling Harrington - 9 5.1 2.4 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 2.6 1.4 -5 -0.5 -29.2 34.8 0 100.0 -0.15 42.9 34.8
Jaylyn Bartolome - 13 6.8 2.3 1.8 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.9 1.8 2.2 35 2.7 41.3 25.0 0.0 81.8 -0.17 44.5 25.0
Allie Dwyer - 16 11.1 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.0 1.1 1.8 1.6 8 0.5 12.0 24.1 17.6 50.0 -1.29 32.9 29.3
Avery Beal - 8 6.7 0.6 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.1 0.9 29 2.9 81.3 22.2 50.0 0 -0.1 27.8 27.8
Cassidy Powers - 4 2.4 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 7 1.8 133.3 50.0 0 0 0.05 50.0 50.0
Hailey Marshall - 5 1.7 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 6 1.5 189.5 0 0 0 -0.47 0 0
Emma Simpson - 2 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 90 4.3 22.8 0 0 0.0 1.21 0.0 0
Emma Medeiros - 1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG