🐻⬇️🏀

Tulsa Golden Hurricane

Also known as: Tulsa Golden Hurricane
Program History

2025 Team Stats (3 games)

60.7
PPG
69.3
Opp
-8.6
Margin
32.1%
FG%
25.6%
3P%
69.0%
FT%
42.7
RPG
11.3
APG
20.3
TO
91.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 990 (#397) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +12.7 (#165) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.0 | AdjD 64.1 More → 0.499 (#215) AdjO 64.0 | AdjD 64.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.741 (#177) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.701 (#179) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 132 | GP 28 More → 1051 (#173) RD 132 | GP 28

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2024-11-06 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions W 63 - 60
2024-12-21 @ Tennessee Lady Volunteers L 61 - 102
2025-03-04 @ Wichita State Shockers W 58 - 46

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
D. Crawford D. Crawford G 3 31.7 17.3 6.3 1.7 1.7 0.7 4.7 17.7 5.3 53 1.6 1.9 26.4 24.2 94.1 1.21 43.0 34.0
M. Cartwright M. Cartwright G 3 25.3 10.7 3.7 2.0 2.0 0.3 2.0 7.3 9.3 42 1.3 1.5 45.5 28.6 71.4 0.61 56.8 50.0
E. Hill E. Hill G 2 28.0 10.5 3.0 2.0 2.5 0.0 1.0 9.0 8.0 33 1.5 1.9 50.0 30.0 0 0.6 58.3 58.3
J. Clack J. Clack G 3 21.3 9.0 5.0 1.3 0.7 0.3 3.0 6.0 7.3 15 0.5 1.0 55.6 60.0 50.0 0.41 62.7 63.9
K. Ayson K. Ayson G 3 25.3 6.3 3.0 1.3 0.3 0.3 3.3 8.0 0.0 2 0.1 0.1 29.2 20.0 57.1 0.23 35.1 31.2
H. Periman H. Periman G 2 36.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 3.5 8.0 11.0 36 1.2 1.4 12.5 22.2 50.0 0.3 22.5 18.8
P. Bradley P. Bradley G 3 19.7 3.0 4.0 0.3 1.7 0.3 2.3 6.0 1.0 119 3.5 3.7 16.7 27.3 0 2.59 25.0 25.0
K. Alexander K. Alexander G 2 9.5 3.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 4.5 1.0 5 0.2 0.5 33.3 0.0 0 0.22 33.3 33.3
L. Foutch L. Foutch F 3 11.0 1.7 2.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.7 1.3 3.0 9 0.3 0.8 25.0 0.0 50.0 0.24 37.7 25.0
C. Mathews C. Mathews G 3 13.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 3.3 6 0.2 0.7 25.0 0.0 50.0 0.23 30.7 25.0
M. Miller M. Miller G 1 8.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 8 0.9 4.3 0.0 0 0 -0.21 0.0 0.0
B. Alexander B. Alexander G 1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 1.4 0 0 0 -1.18 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG