Tulsa Golden Hurricane
2016 Team Stats (6 games)
69.0
PPG
77.0
Opp
-7.0
Margin
44.9%
FG%
30.6%
3P%
66.9%
FT%
33.0
RPG
13.8
APG
12.0
TO
75.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2015-2016
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1414 (#92) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1317 (#126) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.2 (#153) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.223 (#77) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.243 (#66) | NetEff -10.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.354 (#79) | AdjNet -5.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.356 (#78) | AdjNet -5.1 |
2016 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-11-17 | vs | Wichita State Shockers | W | 77 - 67 |
| 2015-11-23 | @ | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 75 - 83 |
| 2015-12-19 | @ | Oregon State Beavers | L | 71 - 76 |
| 2015-12-29 | vs | SMU Mustangs | L | 69 - 81 |
| 2016-01-02 | @ | Cincinnati Bearcats | L | 57 - 76 |
| 2016-02-10 | @ | SMU Mustangs | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2016-03-11 | vs | Memphis Tigers | L | 67 - 89 |
| 2016-03-16 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | L | 62 - 67 |
2016 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Harrison
|
G | 8 | 32.5 | 18.4 | 5.8 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 17.6 | -3 | -0.6 | -0.6 | 53.3 | 40.0 | 72.1 | 0.75 | 78.3 | 56.0 |
J. Woodard
|
G | 8 | 33.1 | 14.1 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 8.2 | 11.0 | 83 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 39.4 | 30.6 | 72.4 | 1.6 | 71.7 | 47.7 |
R. Smith
|
F | 8 | 22.5 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 10.0 | -6 | -1.0 | -2.0 | 51.4 | 50.0 | 54.5 | 0.4 | 89.1 | 54.3 |
P. Birt
|
G | 8 | 25.5 | 8.0 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 5.5 | 6.1 | - | - | - | 34.1 | 37.9 | 69.2 | 0.57 | 64.4 | 46.6 |
D. Wright
|
F | 8 | 21.5 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0.0 | 71.4 | -0.04 | 85.3 | 57.1 |
M. Curtis
|
G | 8 | 23.2 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 37.0 | 25.0 | 75.0 | 0.38 | 80.5 | 40.7 |
B. Swannegan
|
F | 8 | 16.0 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 68.2 | 0 | 46.7 | 0.46 | 73.4 | 68.2 |
R. Ray
|
G | 8 | 16.4 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 26 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 15.0 | 14.3 | 50.0 | 0.61 | 28.7 | 20.0 |
S. Taplin
|
G | 7 | 8.1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 0 | -0.34 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
N. Wood
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
E. Ezechinonso
|
C | 2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
K. Brown
|
G | 2 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG