🐻⬇️🏀

Trevecca Nazarene

Also known as: Trevecca Nazarene
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1105 (#93) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1103 (#100) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 1042 (#164) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → +7.5 (#137) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +10.7 (#203) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.538 (#344) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +11.6 More → 0.821 (#171) NetEff +11.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +12.1 More → 0.801 (#274) AdjNet +12.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +12.5 More → 0.814 (#272) AdjNet +12.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 68.9 | AdjD 60.1 More → 0.691 (#261) AdjO 68.9 | AdjD 60.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.0 | AdjD 58.7 More → 0.660 (#114) AdjO 66.0 | AdjD 58.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.704 (#171) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.705 (#165) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 93 | GP 25 More → 1072 (#174) RD 93 | GP 25

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 @ Murray St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-08 vs Oakwood - Incomplete score
2025-11-11 vs Fisk - Incomplete score
2025-11-14 vs Barry - Incomplete score
2025-11-15 @ Lynn - Incomplete score
2025-11-19 vs Ky. Wesleyan - Incomplete score
2025-11-23 vs Emory & Henry - Incomplete score
2025-12-04 vs AUM - Incomplete score
2025-12-06 vs Montevallo - Incomplete score
2025-12-11 @ UAH - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 @ West Ala. - Incomplete score
2025-12-20 vs West Florida - Incomplete score
2025-12-31 @ Thomas More - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 @ Mississippi Col. - Incomplete score
2026-01-15 vs Christian Brothers - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 vs Union (TN) - Incomplete score
2026-01-22 @ Montevallo - Incomplete score
2026-01-24 @ AUM - Incomplete score
2026-01-29 vs West Ala. - Incomplete score
2026-01-31 vs UAH - Incomplete score
2026-02-05 @ West Florida - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 @ Valdosta St. - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Jordan Gillies - 21 34.7 15.6 7.0 4.7 2.4 1.4 3.3 13.7 14.1 61 2.7 12.1 38.7 33.6 78.2 -0.27 50.9 46.3
Cheyenne Trotter - 21 27.2 13.7 10.9 1.3 1.7 0.7 1.6 9.7 16.9 -20 -0.9 -5.4 54.7 0 70.7 -0.08 58.9 54.7
Tatum Shaw - 21 35.6 12.7 2.8 1.3 1.2 0.1 1.5 12.0 4.5 -15 -0.7 -3.0 41.3 31.3 68.8 4.15 51.3 50.6
Brianna Burgess - 20 31.7 6.5 3.7 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 7.2 5.6 7 0.3 1.5 32.4 26.5 70.0 -0.84 42.3 40.0
Jayda Woods - 20 21.5 5.2 2.2 1.6 1.1 0.2 1.9 5.3 3.0 21 1.1 5.8 39.3 23.3 73.7 1.33 45.5 42.5
Ava Jones - 13 10.2 5.1 3.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 2.4 6.0 41 2.9 30.3 71.0 0.0 81.5 3.46 77.0 71.0
Shinae Howard Johnson - 19 13.1 4.0 2.6 0.5 0.7 0.1 1.4 4.1 2.4 40 2.1 43.9 37.2 23.5 56.0 0.47 42.7 39.7
Natalia Hernandez - 21 19.1 3.3 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 3.2 2.4 -87 -4.3 -38.6 42.6 30.8 80.0 0.51 49.9 48.5
Ellie Butler - 16 8.8 3.1 1.9 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.4 3.7 1.8 -24 -1.5 -48.8 27.1 20.0 66.7 -3.76 36.6 31.4
Jeannae Bolin - 14 6.3 2.6 2.0 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.9 2.2 2.3 23 1.5 32.7 54.8 0 37.5 0.89 53.6 54.8
Dayonna Perryman - 10 5.0 2.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.8 1.8 -24 -2.4 -177.8 38.9 0.0 83.3 -2.47 51.5 38.9
Storm Wilson - 2 4.6 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 -52 -2.6 -24.0 33.3 50.0 50.0 2.41 51.5 50.0
Olivia Onyemobi - 5 2.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 -4 -0.8 -32.9 50.0 0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Carden Vailes - 7 3.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.6 -0.4 -11 -2.2 -70.0 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Ava Cathey - 6 2.3 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.8 -6 -1.2 -49.3 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG