Texas Permian Basin Falcons
Season:
2022
Also known as: Texas Permian Basin Falcons
Program History
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 980 (#358) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 968 (#424) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 997 (#301) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +0.6 (#489) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -0.8 (#363) | HCA +2.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.479 (#325) | AdjO 68.8 | AdjD 69.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.456 (#348) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.460 (#334) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 949 (#269) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2022 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-20 | @ | New Mexico State Aggies | L | 59 - 84 |
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Daniels
|
- | 1 | 34.0 | 27.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 36.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.18 | 0 | 0 |
K. Craddock
|
- | 1 | 25.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 13.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.58 | 0 | 0 |
D. Jones
|
- | 1 | 35.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 19.0 | 176 | 5.3 | 6.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
L. Howard
|
- | 1 | 31.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.17 | 0 | 0 |
K. Frey
|
- | 1 | 32.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.34 | 0 | 0 |
Q. Grimes
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Warren
|
- | 1 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
B. Burrell
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
K. Marzette
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Z. Godwin
|
- | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Crippen
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
B. Morehead
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG