Tex. A&M-Kingsville
Also known as: Tex. A&M-Kingsville
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1091 (#168) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1012 (#352) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +13.5 (#176) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.912 (#232) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.912 (#147) | NetEff +17.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.956 (#163) | AdjNet +26.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.957 (#164) | AdjNet +26.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.832 (#158) | AdjO 74.4 | AdjD 56.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.588 (#246) | AdjO 64.2 | AdjD 60.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.734 (#178) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.709 (#201) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlyn Benally | - | 1 | 24.9 | 16.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 64.3 | 66.7 |
| Addisyn Parker | - | 1 | 35.0 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 66.7 | 50.0 | - | 68.0 | 70.0 |
| Justine Aguilar | - | 1 | 28.3 | 13.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 54.2 | 54.2 |
| Kaycee Groves | - | 1 | 10.4 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 20.0 | 0 | - | 45.0 | 45.0 |
| Evelyn Quiroz | - | 1 | 34.2 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 43.6 | 50.0 |
| Thalia Daniels | - | 1 | 30.8 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 27.3 | 27.3 |
| Katy Frost | - | 1 | 7.4 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 54.3 | 0.0 |
| Jadeyn Perez | - | 1 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -8 | -0.4 | -3.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.81 | 79.8 | 100.0 |
| Ava Mitchell | - | 1 | 8.6 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -47 | -2.9 | -45.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | -2.25 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Landri Richey | - | 1 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Kaylee Howell | - | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG