🐻⬇️🏀

Tex. A&M-Kingsville

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2017 2016
Also known as: Tex. A&M-Kingsville
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 846 (#488) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 868 (#464) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +75 elo More → 893 (#621) HCA +75 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → -0.5 (#178) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More → +0.9 (#352) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.459 (#375) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +58.3 More → 1.000 (#34) NetEff +58.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -10.9 More → 0.188 (#369) NetEff -10.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +13.0 More → 0.816 (#266) AdjNet +13.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +13.6 More → 0.832 (#261) AdjNet +13.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.5 | AdjD 55.6 More → 0.692 (#260) AdjO 64.5 | AdjD 55.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 55.4 | AdjD 59.7 More → 0.403 (#527) AdjO 55.4 | AdjD 59.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.381 (#467) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.375 (#471) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 98 | GP 23 More → 818 (#452) RD 98 | GP 23

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-14 @ Henderson St. L 81 - 85
2025-11-15 vs McMurry W 76 - 62
2025-11-21 vs Colorado Mesa L 39 - 68
2025-11-22 @ Westminster (UT) L 46 - 54
2025-11-28 vs Okla. Baptist L 49 - 68
2025-11-29 vs Washburn L 48 - 62
2025-12-04 vs Texas Woman's L 41 - 52
2025-12-06 vs UT Tyler L 56 - 69
2025-12-11 @ UT Permian Basin L 54 - 67
2025-12-15 @ UTSA L 40 - 82
2025-12-20 vs Daemen L 75 - 80
2025-12-21 vs Tampa L 38 - 60
2026-01-02 vs Cameron W 70 - 41
2026-01-13 vs Tex. A&M Int'l L 71 - 73
2026-01-17 @ Tex. A&M Int'l W 69 - 52
2026-01-21 @ Angelo St. L 46 - 48
2026-01-24 vs Angelo St. L 48 - 69
2026-01-29 @ Western N.M. W 64 - 54
2026-01-31 @ Sul Ross St. L 58 - 62
2026-02-05 vs St. Edward's W 58 - 53
2026-02-07 vs St. Mary's (TX) L 39 - 59

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Quren Santiago - 1 31.3 25.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 13.0 22.0 - - - 69.2 50.0 62.5 - 75.7 76.9
Jera Cotten - 1 30.7 12.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 8.0 8.0 - - - 37.5 0 75.0 - 52.1 37.5
Chioma Emeh - 1 25.9 12.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 10.0 11.0 - - - 30.0 0 75.0 - 44.4 30.0
Kaycee Groves - 20 26.0 10.0 5.0 2.5 1.6 0.7 2.7 10.4 6.7 13 0.7 4.2 34.6 29.1 86.7 1.16 45.2 41.8
Lex Foster - 1 27.4 9.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 10.0 - - - 33.3 50.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Addisyn Parker - 20 33.7 7.7 4.2 3.2 1.4 0.0 3.0 7.7 5.9 0 0.0 0.0 35.3 33.7 54.5 -2.32 47.0 46.1
Thalia Daniels - 18 29.1 7.1 6.5 1.9 0.8 0.3 2.6 7.6 6.4 -2 -0.1 -1.3 37.5 18.5 75.0 0.08 43.9 41.2
Justine Aguilar - 18 18.7 7.1 3.8 0.7 0.7 0.1 2.1 6.9 3.3 -34 -2.1 -17.6 40.3 24.0 72.4 -0.29 46.4 42.7
Evelyn Alcantar - 1 14.1 7.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.0 - - - 40.0 40.0 50.0 - 59.5 60.0
Kaylee Howell - 20 19.4 6.4 4.3 0.7 0.3 0.1 2.4 4.9 4.5 -8 -0.4 -3.1 51.0 0.0 62.2 0.85 54.3 51.0
Gigi Waddell - 1 32.9 6.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 8.0 - - - 40.0 33.3 50.0 - 51.0 50.0
Jadeyn Perez - 19 19.5 5.9 1.8 1.2 0.5 0.1 1.7 4.5 3.3 -4 -0.2 -1.1 43.0 40.0 67.6 0.72 56.0 52.3
Caitlyn Benally - 20 17.8 5.4 3.5 0.8 0.6 0.1 1.1 3.6 5.6 -23 -1.1 -12.3 55.6 20.0 60.0 -3.23 58.8 56.2
Unique McBride - 1 3.8 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 - - - 66.7 100.0 0 - 83.3 83.3
Demetria Smith - 1 20.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 24 1.1 7.1 25.0 0 50.0 2.11 30.7 25.0
Evelyn Quiroz - 6 22.0 2.8 1.8 2.7 0.8 0.3 3.3 4.0 1.2 - - - 29.2 25.0 25.0 - 33.0 33.3
Nailah Zetrenne - 1 8.7 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Ava Mitchell - 20 14.7 1.9 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.1 1.9 2.5 -0.1 -14 -0.7 -12.9 24.5 30.0 68.8 -0.72 33.9 27.6
Landri Richey - 20 13.0 1.9 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.7 2.0 1.6 -78 -3.9 -51.5 36.6 12.5 87.5 -4.21 43.8 39.0
Katy Frost - 20 7.7 1.8 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.4 2.4 26 1.3 51.8 44.4 20.0 66.7 0.21 52.1 46.3
Renata Parga - 6 2.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 -0.3 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Ashley Daniel - 1 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Noura Aboutaleb - 1 2.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG