๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Tennessee Tech Golden

Also known as: Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles
Program History

Model Outputs

2019-2020
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 750 (#308) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 770 (#327) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +96 elo More โ†’ 897 (#294) HCA +96 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More โ†’ -12.3 (#327) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.1 More โ†’ -10.9 (#321) HCA +3.1
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.182 (#326) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -19.0 More โ†’ 0.101 (#332) AdjNet -19.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -19.1 More โ†’ 0.099 (#332) AdjNet -19.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 60.4 | AdjD 71.8 More โ†’ 0.262 (#327) AdjO 60.4 | AdjD 71.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.8 | AdjD 70.8 More โ†’ 0.345 (#313) AdjO 63.8 | AdjD 70.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.219 (#320) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.233 (#318) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 100 | GP 29 More โ†’ 762 (#319) RD 100 | GP 29

2020 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2019-11-05 @ Western Kentucky Hilltoppers L 64 - 76
2019-11-09 vs UT Southern Firehawks W 83 - 70
2019-11-12 vs Wright State Raiders L 80 - 85
2019-11-15 @ UNC Greensboro Spartans L 30 - 64
2019-11-16 vs App State Mountaineers L 47 - 69
2019-11-17 @ Montana State Bobcats L 39 - 52
2019-11-21 @ Winthrop Eagles W 61 - 58
2019-11-25 vs Lipscomb Bisons L 65 - 78
2019-12-02 vs Reinhardt Eagles W 86 - 47
2019-12-08 @ Ohio Bobcats L 54 - 81
2019-12-17 @ Lipscomb Bisons L 60 - 78
2019-12-21 vs Western Carolina Catamounts L 76 - 89
2019-12-29 @ Ole Miss Rebels L 63 - 80
2020-01-02 @ Eastern Kentucky Colonels L 59 - 74
2020-01-04 @ Morehead State Eagles L 72 - 83
2020-01-09 vs Austin Peay Governors L 62 - 75
2020-01-11 vs Murray State Racers L 69 - 81
2020-01-16 @ SIU Edwardsville Cougars W 72 - 69
2020-01-18 @ Eastern Illinois Panthers L 59 - 84
2020-01-23 vs Morehead State Eagles W 71 - 59
2020-01-25 vs Eastern Kentucky Colonels L 74 - 80
2020-01-30 vs Belmont Bruins L 84 - 92
2020-02-01 vs Tennessee State Tigers L 67 - 72
2020-02-06 @ UT Martin Skyhawks L 62 - 74
2020-02-08 @ Southeast Missouri State Redhawks W 62 - 60
2020-02-13 vs Jacksonville State Gamecocks W 75 - 74
2020-02-15 @ Tennessee State Tigers L 55 - 70
2020-02-20 vs UT Martin Skyhawks W 78 - 65
2020-02-22 vs Southeast Missouri State Redhawks W 71 - 62
2020-02-27 @ Belmont Bruins L 62 - 65
2020-02-29 @ Jacksonville State Gamecocks L 71 - 75

2020 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Hunter Vick Hunter Vick G 20 24.4 8.2 2.8 1.2 0.7 0.2 0.8 1.7 10.6 -85 20 -4.2 -7.3 38.2 27.3 100.0 -0.96 222.4 47.1
Darius Allen Darius Allen G 26 20.8 8.0 3.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.6 11.7 -55 26 -2.1 -4.1 31.7 31.0 50.0 0.95 248.3 42.7
Tae Williams Tae Williams G 26 22.0 6.5 3.9 1.8 0.5 0.2 2.0 1.2 9.7 -165 26 -6.3 -12.1 37.5 0.0 25.0 -4.49 250.3 37.5
Cade Crosland Cade Crosland G 24 16.4 5.6 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 1.0 6.6 - - - - 47.8 47.6 100.0 - 272.6 69.6
Amadou Sylla Amadou Sylla - 26 19.3 5.6 5.7 0.5 0.4 1.0 0.8 1.2 11.1 -119 26 -4.6 -10.3 56.2 100.0 33.3 -2.22 210.7 57.8
Jared Sherfield Jared Sherfield G 15 12.5 4.1 1.8 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.1 5.2 -81 16 -5.1 -16.5 47.1 40.0 55.6 -3.78 145.5 58.8
Reece Wilkinson Reece Wilkinson - 24 10.8 3.5 2.9 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.4 6.0 - - - - 40.0 0 25.0 - 352.9 40.0
Garrett Golday Garrett Golday F 16 8.2 3.2 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.3 3.4 -23 15 -1.5 -7.9 40.0 0.0 100.0 -0.92 442.2 40.0
Larry Kuimi Larry Kuimi C 24 10.2 2.7 2.6 0.1 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.7 4.2 - - - - 64.7 0 33.3 - 174.7 64.7
Dane Quest Dane Quest F 21 11.4 1.5 1.5 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.2 2.8 -77 22 -3.5 -13.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 -4.99 317.6 25.0
Maverick Smith Maverick Smith G 13 5.5 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.4 - - - - 0.0 0 0 - 500.0 0.0
Toni Thompson Toni Thompson G 4 3.2 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 - - - - 100.0 100.0 0 - 150.0 150.0
Chase Ridenour Chase Ridenour G 8 3.9 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 250.0 0.0
Caden Mills Caden Mills - 5 3.6 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 1.2 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Michael Lolio Michael Lolio - 3 2.0 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 - - - - 0 0 50.0 - 56.8 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG