๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Tennessee Tech Golden

Also known as: Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles
Program History

2016 Team Stats (1 games)

77.0
PPG
64.0
Opp
+13.0
Margin
53.2%
FG%
38.1%
3P%
82.6%
FT%
25.0
RPG
12.0
APG
11.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
73.8
Adj PPG
75.7
Adj Opp PPG
#192
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2015-2016
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 954 (#198) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1039 (#145) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +98 elo More โ†’ 985 (#193) HCA +98 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ -2.2 (#194) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ -4.8 (#233) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.517 (#168) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -3.7 More โ†’ 0.396 (#196) AdjNet -3.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -3.7 More โ†’ 0.395 (#196) AdjNet -3.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 73.8 | AdjD 75.7 More โ†’ 0.457 (#192) AdjO 73.8 | AdjD 75.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 72.1 | AdjD 75.6 More โ†’ 0.422 (#235) AdjO 72.1 | AdjD 75.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.448 (#193) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.441 (#195) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 132 | GP 29 More โ†’ 986 (#181) RD 132 | GP 29

2016 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2015-11-14 vs Piedmont Lions W 110 - 72
2015-11-16 @ Air Force Falcons L 70 - 80
2015-11-18 @ New Mexico State Aggies L 63 - 76
2015-11-24 vs Jackson State Tigers W 86 - 82
2015-11-27 vs Robert Morris Colonials W 85 - 72
2015-11-28 vs Cincinnati Clermont Cougars W 91 - 66
2015-11-29 vs Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils W 101 - 64
2015-12-02 vs East Tennessee State Buccaneers W 63 - 61
2015-12-05 @ Lipscomb Bisons W 81 - 78
2015-12-12 @ Arkansas Razorbacks L 57 - 83
2015-12-15 @ Chattanooga Mocs L 69 - 80
2015-12-18 vs Miami (OH) RedHawks W 77 - 64
2015-12-22 @ Iowa Hawkeyes L 63 - 85
2015-12-31 vs Eastern Illinois Panthers W 94 - 84
2016-01-02 vs SIU Edwardsville Cougars W 86 - 63
2016-01-07 @ Murray State Racers W 71 - 65
2016-01-09 @ Austin Peay Governors W 72 - 66
2016-01-13 @ UT Martin Skyhawks L 90 - 96
2016-01-16 vs Southeast Missouri State Redhawks W 91 - 55
2016-01-21 @ Morehead State Eagles L 74 - 81
2016-01-23 @ Eastern Kentucky Colonels W 89 - 83
2016-01-28 vs Tennessee State Tigers W 81 - 79
2016-01-30 vs Belmont Bruins W 89 - 79
2016-02-06 @ Jacksonville State Gamecocks W 68 - 58
2016-02-10 @ Tennessee State Tigers L 55 - 85
2016-02-13 vs Jacksonville State Gamecocks W 72 - 70
2016-02-20 @ Belmont Bruins L 86 - 95
2016-02-25 vs Morehead State Eagles L 59 - 69
2016-02-27 vs Eastern Kentucky Colonels W 92 - 82
2016-03-02 vs Austin Peay Governors L 72 - 92
2016-03-28 vs Old Dominion Monarchs L 59 - 75

2016 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Torrance Rowe Torrance Rowe G 24 36.3 18.9 3.0 4.4 0.6 0.1 2.7 1.2 23.0 44 21 2.1 2.6 44.8 38.9 100.0 -1.01 727.6 56.9
Ryan Martin Ryan Martin F 24 29.3 13.7 8.8 1.1 0.5 0.8 2.0 0.5 22.3 68 21 3.2 4.9 75.0 33.3 77.8 1.68 1030.7 79.2
Aleksa Jugovic Aleksa Jugovic G 24 31.6 10.7 2.6 2.5 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.6 14.6 105 21 5.0 6.9 71.4 66.7 66.7 4.0 835.5 85.7
Hakeem Rogers Hakeem Rogers G 24 18.8 10.2 2.1 1.0 0.8 0.0 1.4 0.9 11.8 35 20 1.8 4.1 52.4 53.8 100.0 -0.78 497.6 69.0
Anthony Morse Anthony Morse F 24 22.8 7.6 5.5 0.3 0.4 2.0 1.0 0.2 14.6 5 21 0.2 0.4 100.0 0 100.0 -2.37 1475.8 100.0
Mason Ramsey Mason Ramsey F 24 17.0 5.6 2.5 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.4 8.4 32 21 1.5 4.5 66.7 0.0 75.0 -1.0 535.1 66.7
Josiah Moore Josiah Moore F 4 15.8 4.5 3.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 7.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Shirmane Thomas Shirmane Thomas G 23 21.8 4.2 3.6 2.0 0.7 0.3 1.5 0.3 9.0 6 20 0.3 0.6 42.9 0.0 80.0 -2.68 527.2 42.9
Tre Hansbrough Tre Hansbrough G 14 8.4 2.6 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.4 33 16 2.1 11.9 33.3 50.0 50.0 1.39 463.9 50.0
Savonte Frazier Savonte Frazier G 10 8.1 2.4 1.4 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.1 4.2 11 13 0.8 5.6 100.0 100.0 0 -1.7 1200.0 150.0
Markell Henderson Markell Henderson G 15 6.0 1.7 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 3.2 27 14 1.9 14.6 50.0 33.3 0.0 1.12 194.1 58.3
Courtney Alexander Courtney Alexander F 22 10.0 1.6 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.2 3.8 8 19 0.4 1.8 50.0 0 0.0 -3.61 368.9 50.0
Conner Hall Conner Hall - 4 4.2 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 -0.2 - - - - 0.0 0.0 50.0 - 51.5 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG