Tampa
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1057 (#123) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1074 (#128) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1098 (#73) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +13.6 (#53) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +19.4 (#94) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.859 (#204) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.881 (#147) | NetEff +16.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.960 (#138) | AdjNet +27.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.963 (#144) | AdjNet +27.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.839 (#134) | AdjO 71.9 | AdjD 53.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.802 (#27) | AdjO 70.0 | AdjD 54.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.847 (#61) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.845 (#54) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1147 (#75) | RD 98 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-07 | @ | Harding | L | 66 - 69 |
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Southwest Minn. St. | L | 62 - 63 |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | UAH | W | 71 - 63 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Lee | L | 45 - 47 |
| 2025-11-19 | vs | Colo. Christian | W | 58 - 35 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 49 - 67 |
| 2025-11-28 | vs | Davis & Elkins | W | 89 - 39 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | Bemidji St. | W | 66 - 49 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Eckerd | L | 56 - 69 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Rollins | W | 80 - 67 |
| 2025-12-16 | @ | Lynn | W | 75 - 55 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Mont. St. Billings | L | 53 - 60 |
| 2025-12-21 | @ | Tex. A&M-Kingsville | W | 60 - 38 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Florida Tech | W | 87 - 66 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Barry | W | 79 - 53 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Palm Beach Atl. | L | 54 - 62 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 65 - 67 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Fla. Southern | W | 64 - 55 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Florida Tech | W | 72 - 54 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Nova Southeastern | W | 79 - 60 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Eckerd | L | 63 - 73 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Embry-Riddle (FL) | W | 77 - 53 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Franklin | - | 22 | 24.1 | 14.5 | 6.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 11.3 | 9.1 | 69 | 3.1 | 11.9 | 53.8 | 0.0 | 79.7 | 4.26 | 57.5 | 53.8 |
| Alanis Diaz | - | 22 | 29.1 | 11.1 | 6.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 8.3 | 9.9 | 105 | 5.0 | 17.3 | 53.8 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 1.75 | 58.2 | 55.5 |
| Giorgia Palmieri | - | 22 | 35.3 | 11.1 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 9.6 | 11.1 | 77 | 3.5 | 12.6 | 42.7 | 35.4 | 85.4 | 0.86 | 52.6 | 48.1 |
| Olivia Davis | - | 21 | 34.8 | 9.7 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 5.7 | 10.1 | 99 | 5.0 | 14.7 | 47.1 | 47.1 | 83.1 | 1.17 | 67.9 | 60.9 |
| Amy Thompson | - | 22 | 27.0 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 99 | 4.7 | 17.0 | 44.1 | 42.6 | 75.0 | 1.04 | 62.0 | 61.0 |
| Brooklynn Butler | - | 20 | 19.6 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 18 | 0.9 | 7.1 | 46.7 | 45.0 | 66.7 | 0.62 | 62.1 | 61.7 |
| Faith Pickens | - | 18 | 9.3 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 40 | 2.4 | 47.5 | 48.3 | 20.0 | 68.8 | -0.97 | 52.3 | 49.1 |
| Maddie O'Berski | - | 22 | 15.7 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 25 | 1.2 | 12.4 | 50.0 | 28.6 | 69.2 | 1.82 | 57.1 | 55.0 |
| Jaylin Hartman | - | 4 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | -15 | -3.0 | -35.3 | 60.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | -1.7 | 64.3 | 70.0 |
| Cassidy Kruesi | - | 3 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 41.0 | 37.5 |
| Noelle Mengel | - | 8 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 20 | 2.5 | 905.7 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 100.0 | -0.02 | 59.2 | 56.2 |
| Jade Thompson | - | 17 | 6.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | -3 | -0.2 | -2.0 | 31.6 | 20.0 | 75.0 | -0.45 | 38.5 | 34.2 |
| Baily Walden | - | 4 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Helena Eccel Kuck | - | 8 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 5 | 0.6 | 39.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG