TCU Horned Frogs
2012 Team Stats (2 games)
56.5
PPG
75.5
Opp
-19.0
Margin
37.2%
FG%
38.3%
3P%
64.7%
FT%
29.0
RPG
13.5
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
59.0
Adj PPG
56.5
Adj Opp PPG
#123
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1053 (#142) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 984 (#173) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1010 (#151) | HCA +78 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +2.7 (#122) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +1.8 (#132) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.687 (#103) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.710 (#101) | AdjNet +7.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.722 (#101) | AdjNet +8.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.557 (#123) | AdjO 59.0 | AdjD 56.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.537 (#129) | AdjO 58.1 | AdjD 56.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.590 (#119) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.586 (#116) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1001 (#158) | RD 142 | GP 28 |
2012 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-11 | @ | Georgia Lady Bulldogs | L | 60 - 83 |
| 2011-11-14 | vs | UTSA Roadrunners | W | 65 - 30 |
| 2011-11-17 | @ | SMU Mustangs | L | 38 - 47 |
| 2011-11-20 | vs | NC State Wolfpack | L | 79 - 85 |
| 2011-12-01 | @ | Houston Cougars | W | 80 - 35 |
| 2011-12-04 | vs | Lamar Cardinals | W | 73 - 59 |
| 2011-12-11 | vs | Texas A&M Aggies | L | 53 - 68 |
| 2011-12-18 | vs | Sam Houston Bearkats | W | 60 - 49 |
| 2011-12-20 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 60 - 43 |
| 2011-12-28 | @ | Oklahoma Sooners | L | 54 - 82 |
| 2011-12-31 | vs | Texas Southern Tigers | W | 66 - 38 |
| 2012-01-05 | vs | UT Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros | L | 54 - 56 |
| 2012-01-07 | vs | Harvard Crimson | L | 44 - 56 |
| 2012-01-11 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 46 - 61 |
| 2012-01-14 | vs | Colorado State Rams | W | 79 - 71 |
| 2012-01-18 | vs | UNLV Lady Rebels | L | 57 - 72 |
| 2012-01-21 | @ | Boise State Broncos | W | 74 - 68 |
| 2012-01-25 | @ | Air Force Falcons | W | 66 - 44 |
| 2012-01-28 | vs | New Mexico Lobos | W | 63 - 56 |
| 2012-02-01 | @ | Wyoming Cowgirls | L | 54 - 64 |
| 2012-02-04 | vs | San Diego State Aztecs | W | 58 - 39 |
| 2012-02-11 | @ | Colorado State Rams | L | 59 - 61 |
| 2012-02-15 | @ | UNLV Lady Rebels | L | 54 - 55 |
| 2012-02-18 | vs | Boise State Broncos | W | 73 - 69 |
| 2012-02-22 | vs | Air Force Falcons | W | 61 - 31 |
| 2012-02-25 | @ | New Mexico Lobos | W | 63 - 52 |
| 2012-02-28 | vs | Wyoming Cowgirls | W | 58 - 48 |
| 2012-03-07 | vs | Wyoming Cowgirls | L | 44 - 61 |
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Thompson
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 13.0 | 4.0 | -20 | 21 | -1.0 | -1.5 | 46.2 | 44.4 | 50.0 | 0.92 | 54.0 | 53.8 |
N. Ventress
|
G | 2 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 24 | 21 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 27.8 | 33.3 | 75.0 | 3.84 | 40.5 | 36.1 |
W. Williams
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | -62 | 21 | -3.0 | -4.6 | 45.5 | 50.0 | 0 | -3.52 | 68.2 | 68.2 |
D. Gross
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 7.0 | -2.0 | -40 | 21 | -1.9 | -4.0 | 21.4 | 25.0 | 100.0 | -1.99 | 33.6 | 28.6 |
L. Lovings
|
C | 2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 5.0 | -24 | 21 | -1.1 | -2.1 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.0 | -1.55 | 15.5 | 16.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG