๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

TCU

Also known as: TCU Horned Frogs, TCU
Program History

2014 Team Stats (12 games)

61.2
PPG
79.1
Opp
-17.9
Margin
38.0%
FG%
32.2%
3P%
71.5%
FT%
27.4
RPG
12.1
APG
10.8
TO
-
Est. poss./game
64.3
Adj PPG
66.7
Adj Opp PPG
#203
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2013-2014
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 858 (#282) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 908 (#251) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +92 elo More โ†’ 838 (#346) HCA +92 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ -1.9 (#195) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ -4.0 (#231) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.173 (#325) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -2.3 More โ†’ 0.435 (#191) AdjNet -2.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -2.3 More โ†’ 0.435 (#190) AdjNet -2.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 66.7 More โ†’ 0.445 (#203) AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 66.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.9 | AdjD 69.2 More โ†’ 0.339 (#318) AdjO 61.9 | AdjD 69.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.369 (#251) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.349 (#259) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 143 | GP 30 More โ†’ 908 (#241) RD 143 | GP 30

2014 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2013-11-08 @ SMU Mustangs L 61 - 69
2013-11-12 vs Longwood Lancers L 79 - 82
2013-11-19 vs Abilene Christian Wildcats W 71 - 64
2013-11-24 @ Washington State Cougars W 64 - 62
2013-11-27 @ Alaska Anchorage Seawolves W 73 - 70
2013-11-29 vs Tulsa Golden Hurricane W 72 - 65
2013-11-30 @ Harvard Crimson L 50 - 71
2013-12-05 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs W 71 - 61
2013-12-15 vs UT Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros W 57 - 48
2013-12-19 vs Grambling Tigers W 98 - 75
2013-12-21 vs Tulsa Golden Hurricane W 70 - 58
2013-12-29 vs Texas Southern Tigers W 77 - 64
2014-01-04 vs West Virginia Mountaineers L 69 - 74
2014-01-07 vs Kansas State Wildcats L 47 - 65
2014-01-11 @ Baylor Bears L 62 - 88
2014-01-15 @ Oklahoma State Cowboys L 50 - 82
2014-01-18 vs Texas Tech Red Raiders L 49 - 60
2014-01-22 @ Oklahoma Sooners L 69 - 77
2014-01-25 vs Kansas Jayhawks L 69 - 91
2014-02-01 @ Texas Tech Red Raiders L 54 - 60
2014-02-04 vs Texas Longhorns L 54 - 59
2014-02-08 @ Iowa State Cyclones L 69 - 84
2014-02-12 vs Baylor Bears L 58 - 91
2014-02-15 @ Kansas Jayhawks L 65 - 95
2014-02-19 @ Kansas State Wildcats L 53 - 65
2014-02-22 vs Iowa State Cyclones L 60 - 71
2014-02-24 vs Oklahoma State Cowboys L 54 - 76
2014-03-01 @ West Virginia Mountaineers L 59 - 81
2014-03-05 @ Texas Longhorns L 54 - 66
2014-03-08 vs Oklahoma Sooners L 67 - 97
2014-03-12 @ Baylor Bears L 68 - 76

2014 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kyan Anderson Kyan Anderson G 26 34.8 17.1 2.2 4.8 1.5 0.0 2.8 5.6 17.2 -216 28 -7.7 -9.7 47.6 46.0 85.5 -0.59 126.9 55.5
Amric Fields Amric Fields F 14 31.0 12.4 5.9 1.2 0.4 0.9 1.6 7.9 11.2 -167 17 -9.8 -13.2 39.6 35.3 61.5 -0.93 67.9 45.0
Jarvis Ray Jarvis Ray G 26 27.0 9.7 4.3 1.3 1.2 0.4 1.7 4.6 10.6 -115 28 -4.1 -6.7 42.0 11.1 73.9 1.83 97.2 42.9
Karviar Shepherd Karviar Shepherd F 26 30.7 9.2 6.9 0.7 0.7 1.6 1.3 4.0 13.8 -140 27 -5.2 -7.4 38.5 100.0 70.2 1.59 93.0 38.9
Brandon Parrish Brandon Parrish G 26 28.7 7.7 2.9 0.9 0.5 0.2 1.1 4.0 7.2 -164 28 -5.9 -8.8 33.7 25.6 47.8 0.09 88.1 38.5
Charles Hill Charles Hill G 12 17.0 5.3 2.6 1.2 0.6 0.2 1.2 1.0 7.7 5 12 0.4 1.2 16.7 25.0 33.3 0.3 240.2 20.8
Christian Gore Christian Gore G 26 17.9 4.2 2.5 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.9 1.5 6.0 -113 28 -4.0 -9.8 40.0 35.7 61.1 -2.12 112.7 46.2
Michael Williams Michael Williams G 25 15.2 4.0 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.9 1.6 3.9 -93 27 -3.4 -10.2 29.3 28.6 66.7 -2.91 108.0 34.1
Hudson Price Hudson Price G 21 16.4 2.7 2.2 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.2 4.4 -130 23 -5.7 -17.6 19.2 27.3 92.9 -1.05 88.6 25.0
Thomas Montigel Thomas Montigel G 23 7.3 0.7 1.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.7 -57 23 -2.5 -14.8 0.0 0.0 71.4 -3.0 88.1 0.0
Clyde Smith Clyde Smith G 15 2.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.7 -16 14 -1.1 -19.1 50.0 0.0 0 -2.02 100.0 50.0
Kemal Dincer Kemal Dincer G 7 1.7 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 -14 6 -2.3 -71.5 16.7 0.0 50.0 -2.78 21.8 16.7

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG