TCU
2014 Team Stats (12 games)
61.2
PPG
79.1
Opp
-17.9
Margin
38.0%
FG%
32.2%
3P%
71.5%
FT%
27.4
RPG
12.1
APG
10.8
TO
-
Est. poss./game
64.3
Adj PPG
66.7
Adj Opp PPG
#203
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2013-2014
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 858 (#282) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 908 (#251) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 838 (#346) | HCA +92 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -1.9 (#195) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -4.0 (#231) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.173 (#325) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.435 (#191) | AdjNet -2.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.435 (#190) | AdjNet -2.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.445 (#203) | AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 66.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.339 (#318) | AdjO 61.9 | AdjD 69.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.369 (#251) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.349 (#259) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 908 (#241) | RD 143 | GP 30 |
2014 Schedule & Results
2014 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kyan Anderson
|
G | 26 | 34.8 | 17.1 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 17.2 | -216 | 28 | -7.7 | -9.7 | 47.6 | 46.0 | 85.5 | -0.59 | 126.9 | 55.5 |
Amric Fields
|
F | 14 | 31.0 | 12.4 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 7.9 | 11.2 | -167 | 17 | -9.8 | -13.2 | 39.6 | 35.3 | 61.5 | -0.93 | 67.9 | 45.0 |
Jarvis Ray
|
G | 26 | 27.0 | 9.7 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 10.6 | -115 | 28 | -4.1 | -6.7 | 42.0 | 11.1 | 73.9 | 1.83 | 97.2 | 42.9 |
Karviar Shepherd
|
F | 26 | 30.7 | 9.2 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 13.8 | -140 | 27 | -5.2 | -7.4 | 38.5 | 100.0 | 70.2 | 1.59 | 93.0 | 38.9 |
Brandon Parrish
|
G | 26 | 28.7 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 7.2 | -164 | 28 | -5.9 | -8.8 | 33.7 | 25.6 | 47.8 | 0.09 | 88.1 | 38.5 |
Charles Hill
|
G | 12 | 17.0 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 7.7 | 5 | 12 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 16.7 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0.3 | 240.2 | 20.8 |
Christian Gore
|
G | 26 | 17.9 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 6.0 | -113 | 28 | -4.0 | -9.8 | 40.0 | 35.7 | 61.1 | -2.12 | 112.7 | 46.2 |
Michael Williams
|
G | 25 | 15.2 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 3.9 | -93 | 27 | -3.4 | -10.2 | 29.3 | 28.6 | 66.7 | -2.91 | 108.0 | 34.1 |
Hudson Price
|
G | 21 | 16.4 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 4.4 | -130 | 23 | -5.7 | -17.6 | 19.2 | 27.3 | 92.9 | -1.05 | 88.6 | 25.0 |
Thomas Montigel
|
G | 23 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.7 | -57 | 23 | -2.5 | -14.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 71.4 | -3.0 | 88.1 | 0.0 |
Clyde Smith
|
G | 15 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | -16 | 14 | -1.1 | -19.1 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.02 | 100.0 | 50.0 |
Kemal Dincer
|
G | 7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | -14 | 6 | -2.3 | -71.5 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -2.78 | 21.8 | 16.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG