Stevens
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1087 (#87) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1231 (#37) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1149 (#55) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +8.0 (#110) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +4.0 (#294) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.649 (#379) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.878 (#182) | NetEff +13.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.608 (#342) | AdjNet +3.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.591 (#347) | AdjNet +3.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.529 (#353) | AdjO 64.0 | AdjD 62.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.648 (#181) | AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 59.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.742 (#173) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.736 (#175) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1252 (#45) | RD 101 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Kean | W | 87 - 46 |
| 2025-11-12 | vs | Ramapo | W | 60 - 29 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | RIT | L | 39 - 59 |
| 2025-11-16 | @ | Medgar Evers | W | 101 - 36 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | TCNJ | W | 76 - 74 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Hunter | W | 82 - 67 |
| 2025-12-01 | @ | Scranton | L | 32 - 76 |
| 2025-12-09 | @ | Brooklyn | W | 61 - 38 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | Rowan | W | 65 - 44 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Arcadia | W | 63 - 52 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | King's (PA) | W | 58 - 53 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | DeSales | W | 56 - 51 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Delaware Valley | W | 64 - 49 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | FDU-Florham | W | 72 - 55 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Lebanon Valley | L | 50 - 63 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Arcadia | L | 60 - 84 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | King's (PA) | W | 73 - 58 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Misericordia | W | 87 - 75 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Schubiger | - | 18 | 31.4 | 12.7 | 4.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 11.4 | 6.6 | 102 | 5.1 | 24.6 | 47.1 | 0.0 | 87.2 | 2.87 | 51.1 | 47.1 |
| Leyla Castro | - | 18 | 29.8 | 11.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 85 | 4.7 | 19.5 | 32.6 | 34.0 | 55.8 | 2.03 | 42.6 | 40.4 |
| Ceejay Thomas | - | 9 | 14.5 | 7.8 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 8.7 | 51 | 5.1 | 212.9 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 81.6 | 1.5 | 61.7 | 48.8 |
| Isabella Duval | - | 18 | 25.4 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 60 | 3.2 | 16.7 | 33.9 | 37.6 | 42.9 | -3.09 | 49.1 | 49.1 |
| Maya Abramson | - | 18 | 19.3 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 57 | 3.0 | 24.6 | 40.3 | 15.6 | 57.1 | -1.25 | 44.1 | 42.4 |
| Dorothy Loffredo | - | 18 | 24.6 | 6.1 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 64 | 3.6 | 17.9 | 39.1 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 0.5 | 44.7 | 40.0 |
| Audrey Kehoe | - | 18 | 17.3 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 49 | 2.7 | 23.9 | 53.2 | 0 | 33.3 | 1.57 | 51.8 | 53.2 |
| Fiona O'Boyle | - | 17 | 16.0 | 4.8 | 5.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 8.5 | 70 | 4.1 | 28.5 | 43.2 | 0.0 | 65.4 | 1.3 | 47.4 | 43.2 |
| Katherine Bogutsky | - | 17 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 73 | 4.3 | 46.2 | 45.8 | 42.4 | 78.6 | 1.69 | 63.7 | 60.4 |
| Grace Love | - | 6 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 12 | 2.4 | 69.1 | 50.0 | 54.5 | 0 | 1.07 | 71.4 | 71.4 |
| Emily Marinelli | - | 18 | 8.0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 40 | 2.1 | 48.8 | 36.8 | 34.8 | 33.3 | 1.25 | 47.0 | 47.4 |
| Camryn Kinne | - | 5 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 33.3 | 33.3 | -0.14 | 60.1 | 64.3 |
| Maja Skopic | - | 7 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 14 | 2.3 | 118.7 | 36.4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1.04 | 36.4 | 36.4 |
| Sugar Williams | - | 9 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 20 | 2.2 | 77.0 | 37.5 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.48 | 41.0 | 37.5 |
| Morgan Gentilucci | - | 13 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.7 | -0.1 | 26 | 2.0 | 41.0 | 18.2 | 100.0 | 50.0 | -1.65 | 23.1 | 20.5 |
| Isabella Curanovic | - | 8 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 5 | 0.7 | 31.7 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | -0.67 | 23.7 | 20.0 |
| Trisha Nair | - | 6 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | -2 | -0.5 | -37.2 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.81 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG