Stanton
Also known as: Stanton
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 882 (#484) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 978 (#520) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -40.6 (#697) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.000 (#751) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.000 (#595) | NetEff -58.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.002 (#706) | AdjNet -51.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.002 (#707) | AdjNet -50.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.037 (#714) | AdjO 49.5 | AdjD 85.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.274 (#621) | AdjO 55.9 | AdjD 66.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.055 (#693) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.076 (#681) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 846 (#463) | RD 350 | GP 2 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-11 | @ | Cal Lutheran | L | 50 - 104 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Caltech | L | 30 - 75 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexus Behn | - | 1 | 34.9 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 23.0 | -13.0 | - | - | - | 21.7 | 11.1 | 20.0 | - | 23.8 | 23.9 |
| Sophia Laurel | - | 1 | 35.1 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 14.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 28.6 | 0 | - | 35.7 | 35.7 |
| Tuana Akgun | - | 2 | 29.2 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0.0 | 37.5 | - | 38.4 | 37.5 |
| Melissa Castro | - | 2 | 28.9 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 16.7 | 75.0 | - | 41.8 | 36.7 |
| Mary Gonzales | - | 1 | 31.6 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 47.0 | 50.0 |
| Jang Wei | - | 2 | 22.6 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 23.1 | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | 32.4 | 30.8 |
| Paule Balanzategui | - | 2 | 26.9 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 22.8 | 19.4 |
| Jane Doe | - | 2 | 26.8 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 25.0 | 25.0 | - | 20.5 | 18.8 |
| Naia Beltran | - | 1 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 12.0 | -7.0 | - | - | - | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Mizuki Higushijima | - | 1 | 9.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG