🐻⬇️🏀

Stanton

Season: 2026 2025 2024
Also known as: Stanton
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +56 elo More → 956 (#592) HCA +56 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.0 More → -18.4 (#663) HCA +3.0
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.033 (#772) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -24.0 More → 0.059 (#685) AdjNet -24.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -23.9 More → 0.057 (#683) AdjNet -23.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.7 | AdjD 82.4 More → 0.167 (#683) AdjO 64.7 | AdjD 82.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.9 | AdjD 78.0 More → 0.409 (#568) AdjO 73.9 | AdjD 78.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.298 (#573) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.306 (#582) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 225 | GP 1 More → 906 (#473) RD 225 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-01-25 @ UC Santa Cruz L 73 - 82

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Leo Wagner - 1 25.1 24.0 9.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 11.0 21.0 -86 -5.4 -73.4 72.7 0.0 100.0 -1.02 82.6 72.7
Joe Espy - 1 24.0 22.0 11.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 13.0 22.0 -93 -5.2 -54.2 69.2 0 66.7 0.06 70.3 69.2
Jaden Gamez - 1 21.0 13.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 10.0 4 0.3 20.8 71.4 60.0 0 -1.08 92.9 92.9
Hunter Kennedy - 1 29.2 8.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 9.0 6.0 -74 -5.3 -80.3 33.3 40.0 0 -2.05 44.4 44.4
Ben Lim - 1 21.6 6.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 -1.0 -76 -5.4 -37.0 33.3 0.0 100.0 0.43 43.6 33.3
Thomas Conley - 1 27.7 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 -109 -6.8 -77.8 0.0 0.0 80.0 -2.27 24.4 0.0
Miles Burrows - 1 12.9 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 -1.0 -27 -1.6 -20.1 25.0 0.0 0 -2.35 25.0 25.0
Aidan Carleson - 1 15.1 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 5.0 -98 -5.4 -117.6 25.0 0.0 0 -3.34 25.0 25.0
Ollie Miller - 1 16.6 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 8.0 -6 -3.0 -20.4 0.0 0.0 33.3 -1.08 15.1 0.0
Elijah Brookes - 1 6.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -6 -0.5 -55.4 0 0 0 0.68 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG