Stanford Cardinal
2010 Team Stats (28 games)
75.6
PPG
53.5
Opp
+22.1
Margin
45.5%
FG%
33.5%
3P%
74.3%
FT%
41.6
RPG
17.3
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
80.5
Adj PPG
45.4
Adj Opp PPG
#2
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2009-2010
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1439 (#4) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1569 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1309 (#2) | HCA +89 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +37.5 (#2) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +37.5 (#2) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.981 (#2) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.999 (#2) | AdjNet +56.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.999 (#2) | AdjNet +57.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.960 (#2) | AdjO 80.5 | AdjD 45.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.928 (#2) | AdjO 74.4 | AdjD 46.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.981 (#2) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.978 (#2) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1518 (#2) | RD 95 | GP 38 |
2010 Schedule & Results
2010 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Ogwumike
|
NA | 28 | 0.0 | 18.6 | 9.8 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 12.2 | 16.8 | 574 | 35 | 16.4 | 22.7 | 57.7 | 0.0 | 75.4 | 4.19 | 62.7 | 57.7 |
K. Pedersen
|
F | 28 | 0.0 | 15.2 | 10.1 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 12.1 | 15.1 | 666 | 35 | 19.0 | 23.6 | 43.8 | 33.9 | 82.6 | 5.9 | 54.8 | 49.3 |
J. Appel-Marinelli
|
F | 25 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 8.8 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 10.7 | 14.9 | 572 | 34 | 16.8 | 25.8 | 50.2 | 0.0 | 65.7 | 4.72 | 53.8 | 50.2 |
J. Pohlen-Mavunga
|
G | 28 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 647 | 34 | 19.0 | 25.3 | 39.6 | 39.3 | 88.2 | 8.15 | 54.1 | 51.1 |
R. Gold-Onwude
|
G | 28 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 6.4 | 4.7 | 446 | 34 | 13.1 | 22.6 | 38.9 | 34.1 | 77.8 | 1.8 | 49.8 | 47.2 |
J. Tinkle
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 126 | 31 | 4.1 | 13.0 | 43.8 | 50.0 | 0.0 | -1.13 | 53.3 | 56.2 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG