Stanford Cardinal
2021 Team Stats (4 games)
67.3
PPG
71.2
Opp
-4.0
Margin
44.0%
FG%
31.8%
3P%
72.7%
FT%
34.3
RPG
12.3
APG
16.3
TO
79.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1414 (#44) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1388 (#57) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +30.0 (#95) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.527 (#41) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.808 (#17) | AdjNet +12.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.810 (#17) | AdjNet +12.5 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-30 | @ | Alabama Crimson Tide | W | 82 - 64 |
| 2021-01-02 | @ | Oregon Ducks | L | 56 - 73 |
| 2021-01-23 | vs | UCLA Bruins | W | 73 - 72 |
| 2021-03-10 | vs | California Golden Bears | L | 58 - 76 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O. da Silva
|
F | 4 | 33.0 | 15.5 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 11.0 | 12.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 37.5 | 88.2 | - | 60.2 | 53.4 |
S. Williams
|
- | 2 | 31.5 | 14.5 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 13.5 | 7.0 | 21 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 40.7 | 40.0 | 75.0 | 0.31 | 50.4 | 48.1 |
B. Wills
|
G | 3 | 33.0 | 11.7 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 9.3 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 53.6 | 28.6 | 37.5 | - | 55.5 | 57.1 |
J. Delaire
|
- | 4 | 26.5 | 11.2 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 35.3 | 28.6 | 73.1 | - | 49.5 | 38.2 |
Spencer Jones
|
- | 4 | 33.0 | 8.5 | 6.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 8.8 | -4 | -0.8 | -3.5 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 60.0 | -0.0 | 52.8 | 51.7 |
D. Davis
|
G | 2 | 24.0 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 28 | 2.8 | 5.1 | 36.4 | 50.0 | 80.0 | 0.44 | 49.2 | 40.9 |
Michael O'Connell
|
G | 4 | 19.2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 47.4 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 52.6 | 52.6 |
L. Kisunas
|
- | 4 | 16.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 63.6 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 66.6 | 63.6 |
M. Murrell
|
F | 3 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.01 | 108.7 | 100.0 |
N. Taitz
|
G | 4 | 9.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | -77 | -7.7 | -13.9 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.86 | 30.7 | 25.0 |
J. Keefe
|
- | 4 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 79.8 | 100.0 |
B. Angel
|
- | 4 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
K. Fitzmorris
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
S. Beskind
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG