Stanford Cardinal
2021 Team Stats (7 games)
68.7
PPG
71.7
Opp
-3.9
Margin
43.5%
FG%
35.6%
3P%
68.5%
FT%
34.7
RPG
12.9
APG
15.7
TO
79.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1414 (#44) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1388 (#57) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +30.0 (#95) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.527 (#41) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.808 (#17) | AdjNet +12.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.810 (#17) | AdjNet +12.5 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-30 | @ | Alabama Crimson Tide | W | 82 - 64 |
| 2021-01-02 | @ | Oregon Ducks | L | 56 - 73 |
| 2021-01-14 | @ | Utah Utes | L | 65 - 79 |
| 2021-01-23 | vs | UCLA Bruins | W | 73 - 72 |
| 2021-02-13 | vs | Utah Utes | W | 73 - 66 |
| 2021-03-10 | vs | California Golden Bears | L | 58 - 76 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O. da Silva
|
F | 6 | 31.5 | 14.3 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 9.7 | 10.3 | 91 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 53.4 | 44.4 | 76.9 | 1.63 | 61.9 | 56.9 |
S. Williams
|
- | 4 | 26.0 | 13.0 | 5.2 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 11.0 | 7.0 | 104 | 4.7 | 9.3 | 40.9 | 44.4 | 80.0 | 0.96 | 53.7 | 50.0 |
J. Delaire
|
- | 6 | 26.3 | 10.8 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 8.3 | 8.2 | 22 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 40.0 | 36.4 | 75.0 | 1.08 | 52.2 | 44.0 |
B. Wills
|
G | 4 | 32.0 | 10.2 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 37 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 54.5 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 0.89 | 53.6 | 57.6 |
D. Davis
|
G | 4 | 24.5 | 9.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 8.2 | 197 | 6.6 | 10.9 | 39.3 | 45.5 | 75.0 | 1.49 | 55.7 | 48.2 |
Spencer Jones
|
- | 6 | 29.2 | 9.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 22 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 42.2 | 40.6 | 60.0 | 0.87 | 57.2 | 56.7 |
Michael O'Connell
|
G | 6 | 22.2 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 5.0 | 4.7 | -17 | -0.7 | -1.0 | 43.3 | 33.3 | 71.4 | -0.05 | 49.9 | 46.7 |
L. Kisunas
|
- | 6 | 16.3 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 5.2 | -6 | -0.2 | -0.6 | 43.8 | 0 | 75.0 | 0.1 | 47.9 | 43.8 |
M. Murrell
|
F | 5 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 31 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 75.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.29 | 86.8 | 75.0 |
B. Angel
|
- | 5 | 6.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.8 | -0.2 | -59 | -3.5 | -15.1 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.77 | 22.2 | 22.2 |
N. Taitz
|
G | 5 | 10.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | -34 | -1.4 | -3.7 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.12 | 25.5 | 20.0 |
J. Keefe
|
- | 5 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.0 | 79.8 | 100.0 |
K. Fitzmorris
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
S. Beskind
|
G | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG