🐻⬇️🏀

Stanford Cardinal

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Stanford Cardinal
Program History
Coach: Johnny Dawkins Jr

2011 Team Stats (2 games)

63.5
PPG
67.0
Opp
-3.5
Margin
41.2%
FG%
22.2%
3P%
64.1%
FT%
36.0
RPG
6.0
APG
9.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
64.3
Adj PPG
60.9
Adj Opp PPG
#114
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2010-2011
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1013 (#157) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 992 (#175) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +91 elo More → 942 (#260) HCA +91 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +4.1 (#105) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +2.6 (#132) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.544 (#146) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +7.6 More → 0.706 (#96) AdjNet +7.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +7.7 More → 0.710 (#97) AdjNet +7.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 60.9 More → 0.578 (#114) AdjO 64.3 | AdjD 60.9
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.5 | AdjD 64.9 More → 0.491 (#177) AdjO 64.5 | AdjD 64.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.537 (#148) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.520 (#160) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 139 | GP 28 More → 971 (#181) RD 139 | GP 28

2011 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2010-11-15 vs San Diego Toreros W 64 - 48
2010-11-18 vs Virginia Cavaliers W 81 - 60
2010-11-21 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions W 92 - 49
2010-11-25 vs Murray State Racers L 52 - 55
2010-11-26 @ Tulsa Golden Hurricane L 53 - 65
2010-11-28 vs DePaul Blue Demons W 81 - 74
2010-12-12 vs UC Riverside Highlanders W 55 - 48
2010-12-15 vs North Carolina A&T Aggies W 76 - 59
2010-12-18 @ Butler Bulldogs L 50 - 83
2010-12-21 @ Oklahoma State Cowboys L 68 - 79
2010-12-28 vs Yale Bulldogs W 60 - 44
2011-01-02 vs California Golden Bears W 82 - 68
2011-01-06 @ Arizona State Sun Devils W 55 - 41
2011-01-09 @ Arizona Wildcats L 57 - 67
2011-01-13 vs Washington Huskies W 58 - 56
2011-01-15 vs Washington State Cougars L 58 - 61
2011-01-20 @ USC Trojans L 42 - 65
2011-01-22 @ UCLA Bruins L 57 - 68
2011-01-27 vs Oregon Ducks L 59 - 67
2011-01-29 vs Oregon State Beavers W 70 - 56
2011-02-03 vs Arizona Wildcats L 69 - 78
2011-02-17 vs UCLA Bruins L 65 - 69
2011-02-19 vs USC Trojans L 53 - 69
2011-02-24 @ Oregon State Beavers L 80 - 87
2011-02-26 @ Oregon Ducks W 88 - 71
2011-03-01 vs Seattle U Redhawks W 77 - 66
2011-03-05 @ California Golden Bears L 55 - 74
2011-03-09 vs Oregon State Beavers L 67 - 69

2011 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
J. Green J. Green G 15 33.3 16.0 3.5 0.7 0.6 0.1 2.1 4.5 14.3 -16 28 -0.6 -0.7 34.3 31.0 73.7 -1.15 159.2 41.0
J. Owens J. Owens F-C 15 29.4 11.9 6.5 1.3 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.7 17.3 56 28 2.0 3.1 50.0 0 47.6 3.67 181.8 50.0
A. Brown A. Brown G 15 28.2 10.5 4.1 0.9 0.7 0.1 1.2 2.7 12.4 58 27 2.1 3.7 35.0 17.4 100.0 3.18 192.0 40.0
A. Brown A. Brown F 1 24.0 8.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 5.0 - - - - 57.1 0.0 0 - 57.1 57.1
D. Powell D. Powell F 15 25.3 7.2 6.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.3 12.5 19 28 0.7 1.2 31.4 20.0 66.7 0.71 129.8 32.9
J. Mann J. Mann G 15 30.7 5.0 3.5 4.6 0.9 0.3 2.5 2.3 9.5 18 28 0.6 0.9 34.3 0.0 53.3 0.62 90.1 34.3
J. Gage J. Gage F 10 10.0 4.8 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.6 4.5 -29 17 -1.7 -9.0 25.0 21.4 100.0 -3.41 135.1 34.4
A. Bright A. Bright G 15 18.9 4.3 1.1 1.5 0.5 0.0 1.5 1.3 4.5 17 28 0.6 1.4 25.0 28.6 0 0.09 162.5 35.0
J. Huestis J. Huestis F 14 10.2 2.5 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 3.6 -11 25 -0.4 -2.0 41.7 0.0 100.0 -1.23 135.9 41.7
J. Trotter J. Trotter F-C 12 8.6 1.9 1.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.0 2.5 -16 25 -0.6 -2.0 33.3 0.0 25.0 -1.91 83.6 33.3
A. Zimmermann A. Zimmermann F 11 7.6 1.4 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.8 2.3 16 22 0.7 2.6 11.1 0.0 50.0 0.57 69.7 11.1
G. Harris G. Harris G 10 6.9 0.9 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.3 -1 22 0.0 -0.3 30.0 33.3 100.0 -0.51 41.4 35.0
R. Lemons R. Lemons G 5 3.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 -5 8 -0.6 -7.9 0.0 0.0 0 -1.89 50.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG