St. Anselm Hawks
Season:
2026
Also known as: St. Anselm Hawks
Program History
2026 Team Stats (1 games)
49.0
PPG
84.0
Opp
-35.0
Margin
30.2%
FG%
26.3%
3P%
80.0%
FT%
25.0
RPG
5.0
APG
11.0
TO
70.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 999 (#199) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.7 (#349) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.486 (#237) | AdjO 63.4 | AdjD 64.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.379 (#344) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.400 (#332) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 942 (#258) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Vermont Catamounts | L | 49 - 84 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Forbes
|
G | 1 | 32.0 | 21.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 15.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 59.5 | 50.0 |
A. Shubick
|
G | 1 | 20.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 40.0 | 50.0 | - | 52.1 | 50.0 |
A. Nelson
|
G | 1 | 29.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 97 | 4.4 | 6.4 | 42.9 | 33.3 | 0 | 3.11 | 57.1 | 57.1 |
B. Vaz
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 38.8 | 33.3 |
N. Harmata
|
F | 1 | 21.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 51.5 | 33.3 |
K. McDonough
|
F | 1 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
E. MacNair
|
G | 1 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | -5.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Lilly Nossiff
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
G. Knight
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Gina Gaccione
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Hannah Lynch
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
A. Romps
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
B. James
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M. Trapper
|
G | 1 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
H. Marquez
|
G | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG