🐻⬇️🏀

South Carolina

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: South Carolina Gamecocks
Program History
Coach: Lamont Paris

2013 Team Stats (5 games)

64.2
PPG
68.9
Opp
-2.8
Margin
42.4%
FG%
36.1%
3P%
69.5%
FT%
35.6
RPG
12.0
APG
18.2
TO
78.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1420 (#102) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1563 (#26) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 940 (#507) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +30.2 (#86) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +6.3 (#207) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.326 (#90) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -8.5 More → 0.264 (#149) NetEff -8.5
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -13.3 More → 0.182 (#99) AdjNet -13.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -13.5 More → 0.179 (#97) AdjNet -13.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 67.3 More → 0.405 (#511) AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 67.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.584 (#226) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.541 (#243) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 134 | GP 32 More → 952 (#258) RD 134 | GP 32

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-11 vs Milwaukee Panthers W 82 - 75
2012-11-16 vs Morgan State Bears W 87 - 71
2012-11-19 vs Rider Broncs W 88 - 76
2012-11-21 vs Elon Phoenix L 53 - 65
2012-11-24 vs Missouri State Bears W 74 - 67
2012-11-25 @ Little Rock Trojans W 74 - 62
2012-11-29 @ St. John's Red Storm L 65 - 89
2012-12-02 vs Clemson Tigers L 55 - 64
2012-12-07 vs Jacksonville Dolphins W 91 - 74
2012-12-19 vs Appalachian State Mountaineers W 74 - 69
2012-12-22 vs Manhattan Jaspers W 63 - 57
2012-12-29 vs Presbyterian Blue Hose W 76 - 60
2013-01-05 vs South Carolina State Bulldogs W 80 - 69
2013-01-09 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs L 54 - 56
2013-01-12 vs Auburn Tigers L 71 - 74
2013-01-16 @ LSU Tigers W 82 - 73
2013-01-19 vs Vanderbilt Commodores L 51 - 58
2013-01-22 @ Missouri Tigers L 65 - 71
2013-01-26 vs Arkansas Razorbacks W 75 - 54
2013-01-30 @ Florida Gators L 36 - 75
2013-02-02 vs Georgia Bulldogs L 56 - 67
2013-02-05 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 55 - 77
2013-02-10 vs Tennessee Volunteers L 61 - 66
2013-02-14 vs LSU Tigers L 46 - 64
2013-02-16 @ Alabama Crimson Tide L 58 - 68
2013-02-20 vs Ole Miss Rebels W 63 - 62
2013-02-23 @ Georgia Bulldogs L 54 - 62
2013-02-28 vs Missouri Tigers L 68 - 90
2013-03-02 @ Texas A&M Aggies L 56 - 74
2013-03-06 vs Mississippi State Bulldogs W 79 - 72
2013-03-09 @ Vanderbilt Commodores L 64 - 74
2013-03-13 vs Mississippi State Bulldogs L 59 - 70

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
I. Walker I. Walker - 3 0.0 13.3 3.0 3.7 4.3 0.3 0.7 13.3 10.7 - - - 40.0 30.0 71.4 - 46.4 43.8
L. Page L. Page G 9 24.4 11.7 3.3 0.9 0.3 0.1 1.6 4.7 10.1 36 4.0 8.9 42.9 40.9 94.1 0.38 106.1 53.6
B. Williams B. Williams G 31 21.0 11.0 1.8 1.4 0.7 0.1 1.2 2.2 11.6 62 1.5 2.2 54.4 54.5 96.3 0.98 212.8 67.6
A. Welch A. Welch - 3 0.0 10.3 6.3 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 7.7 10.3 - - - 52.2 0 70.0 - 56.6 52.2
B. Ellington B. Ellington - 22 32.1 10.0 2.5 2.7 1.3 0.2 2.7 0.8 13.3 -93 -4.0 -5.2 23.5 20.0 53.8 -0.08 484.2 26.5
M. Carrera M. Carrera F 27 21.1 9.9 7.2 0.6 0.3 0.6 1.9 1.4 15.4 -54 -2.0 -4.1 53.8 100.0 72.0 -0.06 268.0 55.1
B. Ellington B. Ellington G 4 30.5 9.5 4.8 2.2 0.8 0.0 4.2 9.2 3.8 -93 -4.0 -5.2 32.4 11.1 61.9 -0.08 41.1 33.8
T. Mitchell T. Mitchell - 3 0.0 8.0 3.0 0.7 1.0 0.3 2.3 8.3 2.3 -5 -0.2 -0.2 36.0 50.0 25.0 0.46 42.1 44.0
L. Jackson L. Jackson F 32 28.7 7.5 5.9 1.8 0.8 0.7 1.9 1.2 13.6 -13 -0.4 -0.7 59.0 50.0 47.4 0.03 254.4 60.3
B. Richardson B. Richardson G 31 18.2 7.5 2.2 1.0 0.5 0.4 1.0 0.8 9.7 -33 -1.1 -2.3 53.8 66.7 75.0 -0.23 421.5 73.1
A. Bruner A. Bruner - 3 0.0 6.0 7.3 1.3 1.3 0.3 1.3 9.0 6.0 - - - 22.2 0.0 50.0 - 27.9 22.2
E. Smith E. Smith G 32 27.7 5.7 1.8 3.1 0.6 0.0 2.2 1.6 7.4 -74 -2.3 -3.4 35.3 26.3 70.8 -0.18 147.0 40.2
M. Kacinas M. Kacinas F 31 19.5 4.9 3.7 0.7 0.3 0.5 1.5 0.7 8.0 -5 -0.2 -0.3 66.7 33.3 73.3 0.37 275.4 71.4
S. White S. White - 3 0.0 4.7 4.0 1.0 0.3 0.3 1.0 7.0 2.3 - - - 28.6 28.6 0 - 33.3 33.3
L. Chatkevicius L. Chatkevicius F 23 13.2 4.4 3.2 0.5 0.1 0.6 1.4 0.7 6.8 -33 -1.6 -5.1 46.7 50.0 62.5 -0.01 272.7 50.0
R. Slawson R. Slawson F 32 15.8 4.2 3.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.0 7.1 -39 -1.2 -3.0 45.2 0.0 66.7 0.45 190.2 45.2
D. Leonard D. Leonard G 28 14.8 4.0 1.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.8 -36 -1.1 -2.5 21.4 0.0 80.0 0.05 187.1 21.4
B. Steele B. Steele F 7 11.3 2.3 2.1 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.9 4.4 -31 -4.4 -20.7 33.3 40.0 0 -0.32 133.3 50.0
S. Phillips S. Phillips G 10 3.1 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 -16 -1.5 -9.3 50.0 0.0 0 -0.03 100.0 50.0
A. Constable A. Constable G 4 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG