🐻⬇️🏀

Slippery Rock The Rock

Season: 2013 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
Also known as: Slippery Rock The Rock
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

62.0
PPG
100.0
Opp
-38.0
Margin
36.9%
FG%
28.6%
3P%
57.1%
FT%
31.0
RPG
10.0
APG
12.0
TO
83.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 923 (#814) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 926 (#874) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 999 (#187) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +3.6 (#499) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -2.5 (#353) HCA +3.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 65.8 More → 0.487 (#261) AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 65.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.449 (#319) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.466 (#294) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 929 (#315) RD 350 | GP 1

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-09 @ Michigan Wolverines L 62 - 100

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
D. Taylor D. Taylor F 1 32.0 14.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 12.0 11.0 164 5.1 11.3 33.3 0.0 60.0 0.66 42.7 33.3
L. Santos L. Santos C 1 28.0 12.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 8.0 6.0 - - - 62.5 0 50.0 -0.08 61.5 62.5
A. Reeves A. Reeves G 1 32.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 11.0 - - - 60.0 100.0 0 0.05 70.0 70.0
T. Perry T. Perry F 1 26.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 6.0 71 2.2 8.4 20.0 0.0 0 0.86 20.0 20.0
J. Bayardelle J. Bayardelle G 1 30.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 -5.0 - - - 14.3 25.0 0 -0.46 21.4 21.4

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG